Hello,
Currently "rm -rf" on a file or directory under /proc returns
ENOENT. This is not correct and is caused by the fact that
the posix filename for, say, /proc/uptime is translated to
the following win32 name: c:\cygwin\proc\uptime (if c:\cygwin
is mounted on /).
The attached patches fix this
The attached dir.cc.diff in the original mail was wrong. Please, find attached the
proper
fix for dir.cc.
Sorry for the inconvenience :(
PT> The attached patches fix this problem by returning EROFS
dir.cc.diff
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:37:20PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Currently "rm -rf" on a file or directory under /proc returns
>ENOENT. This is not correct and is caused by the fact that
>the posix filename for, say, /proc/uptime is translated to
>the following win32 name: c:\cygwin\proc\u
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:36:34PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>They are very small:
>
>syscalls.cc.diff and dir.cc.diff have 8 lines added.
>path.cc.diff has line one changed.
>
>Does this require an assignment ?
I took a look at the patches. I don't think they need an assignment so
I checked th
They are very small:
syscalls.cc.diff and dir.cc.diff have 8 lines added.
path.cc.diff has line one changed.
Does this require an assignment ?
CF> I haven't actually read your patch since, AFAIK, you don't have an
CF> assignment with Red Hat, right? If this is the case, would you mind
CF> send
Hello Christopher,
Tuesday, June 04, 2002, 5:35:35 PM, you wrote:
CF> I haven't actually read your patch since, AFAIK, you don't have an
CF> assignment with Red Hat, right? If this is the case, would you mind
CF> sending one in?
Yes, I don't have an assignment. Today I've started the process t
