On 18-01-2021 15:49, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote:
>
> Care to send the resulting patch?
>
Will send with next patch-set.
Ben...
On Jan 18 14:51, Ben wrote:
> On 18-01-2021 14:04, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > What about this instead? It should be better optimizable:
> >
> Hmmm:
> * _remove_r should still set reent->_errno
This is redundant:
errno == (*__errno ()) == _REENT->_errno == __getreent ()->er
On 18-01-2021 14:04, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> What about this instead? It should be better optimizable:
>
Hmmm:
* _remove_r should still set reent->_errno
* _GLOBAL_REENT isn't threadlocal, what about __getreent()
So maybe:
diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc b/winsup/cygw
On Jan 18 13:40, Ben wrote:
> On 18-01-2021 11:56, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > Hmm, you're adding another function call to the call stack. Doesn't
> > that slow down _remove_r rather than speeding it up? Ok, this function
> > is called from _tmpfile_r/_tmpfile64_r only, so dedu
On 18-01-2021 11:56, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> Hmm, you're adding another function call to the call stack. Doesn't
> that slow down _remove_r rather than speeding it up? Ok, this function
> is called from _tmpfile_r/_tmpfile64_r only, so dedup may trump speed
> here...
>
>
On Jan 15 14:45, Ben Wijen wrote:
> The _remove_r code is already in the remove function.
> Therefore, just call the remove function and make
> sure errno is set correctly in the reent struct.
> ---
> winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc | 15 ++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
The _remove_r code is already in the remove function.
Therefore, just call the remove function and make
sure errno is set correctly in the reent struct.
---
winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc b/win
