On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:01:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I just wanted to say that I haven't forgotten about this patch and I plan
on adding it + some modifications soon.
I've just checked in a superset of this patch. I deleted a lot more
stuff from window.cc (and wininfo.h) and added
I just wanted to say that I haven't forgotten about this patch and I plan
on adding it + some modifications soon.
cgf
- Original Message -
From: Pierre A. Humblet
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Patch]: Timer functions
At 11:00 PM 3/6/2005 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I am puzzled by a couple of things.
Why did you decide to forego using th-detach in favor of (apparently
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:20:40AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Pierre A. Humblet
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Patch]: Timer functions
At 11:00 PM 3/6/2005 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I am puzzled by a couple of things.
Why
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:45:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
The attached patch implements the alarm, ualarm, setitimer and
getitimer with the timer_xxx calls created by Chris last year.
It has two objectives, both motivated by exim.
- The current implementation of alarm() opens a hidden
At 11:00 PM 3/6/2005 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:45:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
The attached patch implements the alarm, ualarm, setitimer and
getitimer with the timer_xxx calls created by Chris last year.
It has two objectives, both motivated by exim.
-
