On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:04:05PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>Do you want to apply the patch now, or I do it this evening?
>
>I applied it. I also got rid of all of the now-obsolete
>arguments/parameters to fixup_after_exe
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Do you want to apply the patch now, or I do it this evening?
I applied it. I also got rid of all of the now-obsolete
arguments/parameters to fixup_after_exec.
cgf
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Feb 1 16:57, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > At 01:39 PM 2/1/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:18:48PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > >>Fortunately it is never used in the case of spawn: all handles are
> > >>inherited, or the
On Feb 1 16:57, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> At 01:39 PM 2/1/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:18:48PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >>Fortunately it is never used in the case of spawn: all handles are
> >>inherited, or the parent does the work (sockets).
> >
>
At 01:39 PM 2/1/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:18:48PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>Fortunately it is never used in the case of spawn: all handles are
>>inherited, or the parent does the work (sockets).
>
>The one placed the handle is actually used is in
>fh
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:18:48PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Fortunately it is never used in the case of spawn: all handles are
>inherited, or the parent does the work (sockets).
The one placed the handle is actually used is in
fhandler_socket::fixup_after_exec. I'd like Corinna's confirm
Now that 1.5.7 is out I am continuing to look at security issues
in the Cygwin core. I can refresh the tty patch of mid December
on demand.
Meanwhile here is a very straightforward patch involving only
deletions.
ciresrv.parent is a handle to the parent process for fork
and spawn fixups. It has
