Op Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:42:16 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 11:32:27PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > 2004-10-28 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >
: > * cygcheck.cc (get_dword): Fix errormessage.
: > (cygwin_info): Ditto.
: >
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 11:32:27PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>2004-10-28 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * cygcheck.cc (get_dword): Fix errormessage.
> (cygwin_info): Ditto.
> (track_down): Ditto.
> (check_keys): Ditto.
Go ahead and check these in.
Thanks,
cgf
Op Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:22:38 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 06:31:11AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > Following (trivial, once more, I hope) patch cleans up some of the
: > (IMO) inappropriate ``keyeprint'' usage in cygcheck. It (keyeprint)
: >
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 06:31:11AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>Following (trivial, once more, I hope) patch cleans up some of the
>(IMO) inappropriate ``keyeprint'' usage in cygcheck. It (keyeprint)
>should not be used when GetLastError does not apply, I think. Also the
>format ending in ``failed
Hi,
Following (trivial, once more, I hope) patch cleans up some of the
(IMO) inappropriate ``keyeprint'' usage in cygcheck. It (keyeprint)
should not be used when GetLastError does not apply, I think. Also the
format ending in ``failed'' can cause strange messages like ``NULL
pointer for file fail
