On Oct 23 17:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Keith Marshall wrote:
And just like Earnie's, the response he requested from me also bounced.
Forwarded copy below:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [patch]: Decouple cygwin building from
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:23 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
If the original patch with the aforementioned changes is ok with
everybody, I'd apply it asap and remove lsaauth/cyglsa64.dll,
lsaauth/make-64bit-version-with-mingw-w64.sh, and utils/mingw.
Revised patches for winsup/cygwin and
On Oct 24 04:30, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:23 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
If the original patch with the aforementioned changes is ok with
everybody, I'd apply it asap and remove lsaauth/cyglsa64.dll,
lsaauth/make-64bit-version-with-mingw-w64.sh, and utils/mingw.
On Oct 24 11:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 24 04:30, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:23 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
If the original patch with the aforementioned changes is ok with
everybody, I'd apply it asap and remove lsaauth/cyglsa64.dll,
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 12:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Checking in toplevel patches requires global checkin rights. I can
apply the toplevel patch when you applied the rest. Other than that,
toplevel patches also have to be kept aligned with the gcc repo. I'll
make sure to inform
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:29:13AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 22 00:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yeah, since the changes to the configury separate Cygwin from mingw and
w32api, staying in src/winsup is no problem at all. I always thought
mingw is part of the src tree for gcc bootstrap
Hi Yaakov,
On Oct 21 16:39, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:33 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
I'll include those changes and post a new patch then.
Revised patches for toplevel, winsup, winsup/cygwin, winsup/lsaauth, and
winsup/utils attached. Tested on Cygwin and F17
On Oct 19 20:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 19 11:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:21 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Other than that, I think it's good to go in after the 1.7.17 release.
I'll try to do the release at some point between now and Monday.
I'll
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 13:33 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On second thought... considering that w32api is now Mingw64 based, and
considering that building Cygwin with this Mingw64 built w32api works
fine... what do you guys think about a once and for all approach? Is
it really necessary to
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:33:20PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 19 20:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 19 11:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:21 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Other than that, I think it's good to go in after the 1.7.17 release.
I'll try to do the
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:32:41PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 13:10 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
That said, is it time to ask the mingw.org stuff to relocate their CVS
repo? I could tar up the affected CVS directories for them if so.
What about some CVSROOT/modules
On Oct 18 12:20, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:34 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Any problem to move mingw64-i686-zlib into the distro?
None; should I also move the other setup.exe prerequisites for
i686-w64-mingw32? Would you also like x86_64 versions of any of those?
On Oct 19 11:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Thanks. Looks good, I have problems with this patch.
That should have been:
Thanks. Looks good, I just have a few small problems with this patch.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:21 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 18 12:20, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
None; should I also move the other setup.exe prerequisites for
i686-w64-mingw32? Would you also like x86_64 versions of any of those?
If it's not asked too much, sure on both accounts!
Hi Yaakov,
On Oct 18 02:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 15:32 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
But, anyway, nevermind. This shouldn't be a requirement for getting
these changes checked in. I'm more concerned with just nuking the
now-unneeded mingw script.
Draft
Hi Corinna,
2012/10/18 Corinna Vinschen:
Hi Yaakov,
On Oct 18 02:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 15:32 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
But, anyway, nevermind. This shouldn't be a requirement for getting
these changes checked in. I'm more concerned with just nuking the
On Oct 18 17:57, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi Corinna,
2012/10/18 Corinna Vinschen:
Hi Yaakov,
On Oct 18 02:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 15:32 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
But, anyway, nevermind. This shouldn't be a requirement for getting
these changes checked
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:34 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Any problem to move mingw64-i686-zlib into the distro?
None; should I also move the other setup.exe prerequisites for
i686-w64-mingw32? Would you also like x86_64 versions of any of those?
The idea of the branch is to collect all
Hello everybody,
This patch modifies the bits of build-process so that cygwin and mingw
building is decoupled from each other.
Additionally the patch decouples cygwin's build from the w32api of mingw.org.
By this change it is now possible to build cygwin (and utilities) with
mingw.org's and
Hi Kai,
On Oct 17 18:13, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hello everybody,
This patch modifies the bits of build-process so that cygwin and mingw
building is decoupled from each other.
Additionally the patch decouples cygwin's build from the w32api of mingw.org.
By this change it is now possible to build
On Oct 17 12:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:13:18PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
-[ $dir = '/' ] dir=''
+[ $dir = '/' ] dir='';
No need for a semicolon here.
I have other comments but I wonder if it would just be best to scrap this
script and assume that there is a
21 matches
Mail list logo
