Re: Correct debugging output in seteuid32

2005-04-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 14 16:24, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: I can see why would one think this is a bug, but it was meant to be that way. Having a wrong gid can make seteuid fail. Perhaps we could print the new and current uids and the current gid to cover all cases. Yep, that's how I did it already locally.

Re: Correct debugging output in seteuid32

2005-04-14 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
I can see why would one think this is a bug, but it was meant to be that way. Having a wrong gid can make seteuid fail. Perhaps we could print the new and current uids and the current gid to cover all cases. Pierre At 01:59 PM 4/14/2005 +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote: I'd submit a trivial patch

Correct debugging output in seteuid32

2005-04-13 Thread Kazuhiro Fujieda
I'd submit a trivial patch after a long time. 2005-04-14 Kazuhiro Fujieda [EMAIL PROTECTED] * syscalls.cc (setuid32): Correct debugging output. Index: syscalls.cc === RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc,v