At 01:10 AM 2/28/2003 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:02:58AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>At 12:56 AM 2/28/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:49:59AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:02:58AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 12:56 AM 2/28/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:49:59AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>>OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
>>>of changes.
>>
>>Do you think it would make sense to do some
At 12:56 AM 2/28/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:49:59AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
>>of changes.
>
>Do you think it would make sense to do something along the lines
>of:
>>+ path_conv pc (cfd->is_device ? cfd->g
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:56:35AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:49:59AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
>>of changes.
>
>Do you think it would make sense to do something along the lines
>of:
>
>>+ path_co
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:49:59AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
>of changes.
Do you think it would make sense to do something along the lines
of:
>+ path_conv pc (cfd->is_device ? cfd->get_name () : cfd->get_win32_name (),
>PC_SYM_
OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
of changes.
Pierre
2003-02-28 Pierre Humblet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* syscalls.cc (fstat64): Pass get_name () to pc.
(access): Pass fn to stat_worker.
Index: syscalls.cc
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:54:37PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 11:36 PM 2/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>Pierre,
>>You and Corinna are giving me a headache. :-)
>
>My immediate access () problem can be fixed by replacing
>real_path by fn in the stat_worker call.
>
>Problem #1 is a real bug,
At 11:36 PM 2/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Pierre,
>You and Corinna are giving me a headache. :-)
My immediate access () problem can be fixed by replacing
real_path by fn in the stat_worker call.
Problem #1 is a real bug, should be easy to fix, and may not
show up anywhere anyway, so not urgent.
Pierre,
You and Corinna are giving me a headache. :-)
The code on my branch changes all of the device handling. The stat
stuff is different, too. The changes that Corinna just made were very
tough to integrate. Your changes will be too. In fact, I think everything
you did will probably not be
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 05:33:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:32:36AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If I read Pierre's previous message correctly, it sounds like /bin/test
>> is now broken. Was someone going to fix that?
>
>/bin/test as well as bash are *still
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:32:36AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If I read Pierre's previous message correctly, it sounds like /bin/test
> is now broken. Was someone going to fix that?
/bin/test as well as bash are *still* broken, so nothing has changed ;-)
I'll upload a new bash soon after
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If I read Pierre's previous message correctly, it sounds like /bin/test
> is now broken. Was someone going to fix that?
It's not any worse than before but not as good as sh, or (soon) bash.
I was going to mention this to the sh-utils maintainer :)
I can send a proper
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Applied.
Corinna,
I am still worried about using !real_path.exists() to determine
non existence, as done in several places in Cygwin.
That function checks if the file attributes are
After some experiments I found out that GetFileAttributes returns
FFF on
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:15:34PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> However bash already uses access() when AFS is defined. Thus it
>> would be a 1/2 line patch in bash (test.c and findcmd.c) to also
>> use access() for Cygwin.
>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:15:34PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> However bash already uses access() when AFS is defined. Thus it
> would be a 1/2 line patch in bash (test.c and findcmd.c) to also
> use access() for Cygwin.
> - #if defined (AFS)
> + #if defined (AFS) || defined (__CYGWIN__)
> T
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:15:34PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>2) I am not sure when to use LoadDLLfuncEx vs. LoadDLLfunc.
LoadDLLfunc issues an error if a function isn't found. LoadDllFuncEx
lets you return an error code when the function isn't found.
cgf
16 matches
Mail list logo
