Re: fhandler_tty patch

2002-11-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 06:57:42PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: The patch resolves -1 return value from ioctl(slave_tty, TIOCSWINSZ, ...) problem and avoids extra SIGWINCH if the window size did not change. 2002-11-03 Sergey Okhapkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] * fhandler_tty.cc

Re: fhandler_tty patch

2002-11-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:11:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: I'll apply the patch... Oops. Forgot the gratefully accepted part. Thank you for the patch! cgf

Re: fhandler_tty patch

2002-11-03 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
- Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 8:11 PM Subject: Re: fhandler_tty patch Ok. I haven't looked closely at this code before. I just am not sure what use setting the size on a pty master would entail

Re: fhandler_tty patch

2002-11-03 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
- Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 8:13 PM Subject: Re: fhandler_tty patch On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:11:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: I'll apply the patch... Oops. Forgot the gratefully

Re: fhandler_tty patch

2002-11-03 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
- Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 9:15 PM Subject: Re: fhandler_tty patch I don't mean SIGWINCH. I thought the master was supposed to be able to arbitrate slave window size requests somehow. Sure