tml).
Server binary, direct link:
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test64.exe.bz2 (1100 KiB)
Server source, direct link:
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/xwin-20020708-2212.tar.bz2 (81 KiB)
xc/programs/Xserver/Imakefile diff against 20020708 XFree86 CVS:
http://www.msu.edu/~hun
Alexander,
> > 1) In winconfig.c, why is this there:
> >
> > #ifndef PROJECTROOT
> > #define PROJECTROOT "/usr/X11R6"
> > #endif
>
> Hm, I just copied it from xf86Config.c. Just to be sure it's defined.
>
I added ``-DPROJECTROOT=$(PROJECTROOT)'' to DEFINES in hw/xwin/Imakefile and
I put quotes (
What's the recommended upgrade procedure now that XFree is in Cygwin setup?
I'm still downloading the latest Server Test Series build from
xfree86.cygwin.com and copying it over /usr/X11R6/bin/XWin. Will I miss
something by not running setup?
- Bradey
-Original Message-
From: Harold L Hu
I know I have run into problems a couple of times with programs that
have windows installers that somehow like to assume that you don't
already have Cygwin on your machine.
The first time I installed Octave, it replaced my Cygwin with some
minimal installation it needed to support itself.
Someth
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, I believe WinCVS does tell them to put the dll in
> system.
If so, then they should be vigorously insulted, and possibly shunned.
Think of the frenchmen in "Monty Python's The Holy Grail". However, I
can't find anything prominent on their site th
--- Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Harold L Hunt wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey, go easy on yourself. Most users like to argue with us about how
> they
> > don't have a second copy of cygwin1.dll on their system. After a few
> rounds
> > they end up finally doing the search and, lo!, th
Harold L Hunt wrote:
>
> Hey, go easy on yourself. Most users like to argue with us about how they
> don't have a second copy of cygwin1.dll on their system. After a few rounds
> they end up finally doing the search and, lo!, they find a second copy of
> cygwin1.dll. You should be commended
Sanford,
> You are ABSOLUTELY correct! I found another copy in /winnt/system. I deleted
> that one and, yes, it does work just fine with cygwin1.dll version 1.13.12-1
> in \cygwin\bin.
Great!
> Sorry for causing trouble because of my own stupidity!
Hey, go easy on yourself. Most users like to
You are ABSOLUTELY correct! I found another copy in /winnt/system. I deleted
that one and, yes, it does work just fine with cygwin1.dll version 1.13.12-1
in \cygwin\bin.
Sorry for causing trouble because of my own stupidity!
Sandy
-Original Message-
From: Harold L Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Looks like we fixed another one :)
Harold
P.S. Robert - notice that I'm cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] on all replies.
Please start doing so in future replies.
Forwarded From: Robert Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just installed the latest setup.exe and asked for "all" to be installed.
> It's runnin
Robert,
You are running cygwin-1.3.11-3 and XFree86-xserv-4.2.0-7. Please upgrade as
I requested by getting the latest Cygwin setup.exe
(http://cygwin.com/setup.exe) and running it. It will only upgrade packages
that have been updated, so the download will not take long.
By the way, are you ab
Claudio,
You can use ``startx -- -query ip_of_remote_machine'' unless you have modified
the startx scripts to stop launching local X clients.
I recommend instead that you make a copy of startxwin.bat and edit the `start
XWin' line for your platform (Windows 95/98/Me or Windows NT/2000/XP) to use
Sanford,
Do a search for `cygwin1.dll' on your system using the Windows file search
utility. Tell us (at [EMAIL PROTECTED]) how many copies you find.
Harold
"Zelkovitz, Sanford J (ZERO CHAOS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Actually, when it fails, it does not generate an Xwin.log file. It does,
> > >> >and in setup.ini :
> > >> >@ kdelibs-2
> > >>
> > >> Get rid of this. I suspect that it is
> confusing setup.exe.
Found in /etc/setup/installed.db :
kde-x-1.2
kde-x-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2.tar.bz2 0
kde-x-1.3
kde-x-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3.tar.bz2 0
kd
I'm sorry for my poor english but i don't kwown it very well .I'm a programmer
and I'd like unix but unfortunately j have to work on windows paltform so i have
installed cygwin on my windows 2000 workstation. Actualy i have the latest
version of cygwin (1.3.12-1) and Xwin (4.2.0-7) installed. If i
Robert,
The Windows dump file won't be of any help.
However, you could send in /etc/setup/installed.db. That way we know what
versions of things you have.
There have been several significant Cygwin/XFree86 updates since the 26 of
June. I highly advise that you update.
Harold
Robert Taylor <
Jehan,
Excellent. I'll try to merge this tonight.
Harold
Jehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Harold Hunt wrote:
> > However, there are a bunch of ^M's showing up in the patch file for
> > winwndproc.c starting at about line 496 (in the patch file). Could you
> > clean that up and resubmit?
>
Sanford,
We are not aware of any problems with Cygwin/XFree86 on the latest versions of
cygwin1.dll. In fact, I've been running Cygwin/XFree86 all day on 1.3.12-2
without any problems, whatsoever.
Send in your /tmp/XWin.log file and we will tell you if it has any relevant
information.
Thanks,
Robert,
[For others: this is a followup to a post on ./ where Robert said that Windows
XP rebooted when he ran XWin.exe]
There doesn't seem to be any error recorded, at all.
Try downloading the latest setup.exe (http://cygwin.com/setup.exe) and update
your XFree86-xserv package. Make sure that
Hi,
I'm give the new gcc that was announced on the cygwin mailing list a try.
One of the X projects I'm working on requires the makedepend program be
run. The problem is that makedepend's default search path is looking in
the wrong directories. Specifically it is try to look in the wrong
gcc-l
Harold,
I hope this is helpful.
Robert J. Taylor
XWin.log
Description: Binary data
Harold Hunt wrote:
> However, there are a bunch of ^M's showing up in the patch file for
> winwndproc.c starting at about line 496 (in the patch file). Could you
> clean that up and resubmit?
Hmm, I wonder were they are coming from, I was editing the file in Unix
mode. Anyway, here it is.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> upset would probably do the right thing with the above but I really don't
> see any reason to use it, regardless. I don't see any reason why a user
> would need to know that these are kdelibs-2 when it is pretty obvious from
> the version number.
The naming was p
The last two version of cygwin1.dll ( 1.13.12 and 1.13.11 ) seem not to work
with the xfree release code. It appears that the code fails when run under
the list DLLs. If I switch back to the version prior to 1.13.11, all works
as advertised. Does anyone else have the same problem? Does anyone kno
Alexander,
> Interesting article. I'll check what is needed to get current CVS cross-
> compile in that build environment.
Okay.
> I made the following changes to build imake (the diff I'll send Thursday
> will show this in complete)
>
> - set BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS to "-Ulinux -D__CYGWIN__"
> - pass
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
> I did a little research and indeed it is those damn SuSE people who broke
> the cross compiling system! Take a look at:
> http://www.xfree86.org/~keithp/xconf2001/cc-imake.pdf
Interesting article. I'll check what is needed to get current CVS cros
--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:35:12PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:16 PM
> >
> >> >and in setup.ini :
Actually, I am just about to add per-user registry support, so you might as
well use the registry.
Harold
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rasjid Wilcox
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:33 AM
> To: Tim Thomson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
--- Harold Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, cross compiling is toroughly broken right now. It will take awhile
> to
> get it working properly. I'd appreciate it if anyone that is cross
> compiling the current XFree86 cvs would send in their host.def, any
> modification they made to cygwin
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +1000, Rasjid Wilcox wrote:
> Personally, I would go for a config file.
OK, but where to put it? A global one in the install dir, then write changes
to one stored in a home directory somewhere? That is an advantage of using the
registry, you can just use local
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Rasjid Wilcox wrote:
> I got a XDMCP session going on Cygwin-XFree86 around September 2001 using
> nothing but
[some programs]
> and a bash script called winxterm.sh.
thanks for checking this.
bye
ago
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 7:08 am, Tim Thomson wrote:
> I would prefer that xlauncher, or a variant be installable via setup.exe,
> so it can be used by anyone. If it means porting/rewriting, I'll give it a
> shot :) (There isn't all that much code there, most is just writing to
> registry, and reading
A while back I did some work creating a standalone XDMCP client, more as
a test than anything.
Xwin depends on cygz.dll & cygwin1.dll as ago said. Xwin complains if it
doesn't have rgb.txt, this can be put anywhere though and its location
specified in the Xwin command line (needs a cygwin styl
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 5:05 am, Rhialto wrote:
> Hi, I am not subscribed to this mailing list but I would like to give
> some feedback anyway. Please Cc: any responses to me.
>
> I am testing the Cygwin/XFree server to use it as a remote display for
> my Unix box which runs xdm: XWin -broadcast.
>
> S
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Could you send me a sample and/or skeleton (containing commented versions of
> each config option) config file?
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/test-config-1/X-Server.tar.bz2
contains a sample config file.
bye
ago
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Yup, cross compiling is toroughly broken right now. It will take awhile to
> get it working properly. I'd appreciate it if anyone that is cross
> compiling the current XFree86 cvs would send in their host.def, any
> modification they made to cygwin.cf, e
36 matches
Mail list logo
