Re: Icon update .diff

2005-09-04 Thread Colin Harrison
Hi, Joe Krahn wrote: > 3) Decide if Win95/Me/NT/2000 need continued support. Cygwin has dropped Me, Microsoft 95/98 (support 'till Jun 2006) and NT (dead now even if you pay). Typical Microsoft, though...you have to read loads of pages of guff until you can guess at the true story! Anyone tried

Re: Icon update .diff

2005-09-04 Thread Peter Valdemar Morch
Joe Krahn jkrahn-at-nc.rr.com |Lists| wrote: 3) Decide if Win95/Me/NT/2000 need continued support. Win 2000 - yes please... Peter -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.co

Batch conversion between vector graphics?

2005-09-04 Thread Angel Tsankov
Does cygwin include an application suitable for batch conversion of .fig files to .eps? If so, what is it? Angel Tsankov [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x

Re: Icon update .diff

2005-09-04 Thread Joe Krahn
Colin Harrison wrote: Joe Krahn wrote: When I use the CVS defaults, only multi-window mode is built, so I didn't see the #ifdef XWIN_MULTIWINDOW code compiled. Why is only one version built? Is it rootless mode that gets excluded? Mystery to me..the code is loaded with many ifdef's, the use

Re: Icon update .diff

2005-09-04 Thread Colin Harrison
Joe Krahn wrote: > When I use the CVS defaults, only multi-window mode is built, so I didn't see the #ifdef XWIN_MULTIWINDOW code compiled. Why is only one version built? Is it rootless mode that gets excluded? Mystery to me..the code is loaded with many ifdef's, the use of which is probably 'jus

Re: Icon update .diff

2005-09-04 Thread Joe Krahn
Colin Harrison wrote: Hi, All your diffs seem to work almost correctly (see below), but still testing. In windialogs.c:- Should SM_CXICONSM be SM_CXSMICON, SM_CYICONSM be SM_CYSMICON ? Also had to remove the conditional on XWIN_MULTIWINDOW to get X icons It looks like that part of the code wa

Re: GetDC(NULL), GetModuleHandle(NULL), etc.

2005-09-04 Thread Joe Krahn
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Joe Krahn wrote: GetModuleHandle(NULL) is also in several places. Maybe it's OK, but why not use the hInstance global? Global variables are bad(TM). With GetModuleHandle(NULL) there is no need to maintain a global hInstance. The other reason is

Re: GetDC(NULL), GetModuleHandle(NULL), etc.

2005-09-04 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Joe Krahn wrote: > GetModuleHandle(NULL) is also in several places. Maybe it's OK, but why > not use the hInstance global? Global variables are bad(TM). With GetModuleHandle(NULL) there is no need to maintain a global hInstance. The other reason is there is no WinMain which h

Re: Icon update .diff

2005-09-04 Thread Colin Harrison
Hi, All your diffs seem to work almost correctly (see below), but still testing. In windialogs.c:- Should SM_CXICONSM be SM_CXSMICON, SM_CYICONSM be SM_CYSMICON ? Also had to remove the conditional on XWIN_MULTIWINDOW to get X icons i.e. --- my_windialogs.c 2005-09-03 22:36:08.0 +0