Re: Cygwin 1.7.22 calls dumper when starting X

2013-08-01 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Charles Wilson wrote: Is there a way to test run-2.0? What is the syntax to replace: C:\Cygwin\bin\run.exe /usr/bin/bash.exe -l -c /usr/bin/startxwin.exe Sure: and how to replace C:\cygwin-2\bin\run.exe bash -l -c 'rm -rf /tmp/{.X*,dbus*,orbit*,*}; XWin -nowgl -multiwindow -clipboard -sile

Re: Cygwin 1.7.22 calls dumper when starting X

2013-08-01 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/1/2013 7:19 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: Charles Wilson wrote: Is there a way to test run-2.0? What is the syntax to replace: C:\Cygwin\bin\run.exe /usr/bin/bash.exe -l -c /usr/bin/startxwin.exe Sure: and how to replace C:\cygwin-2\bin\run.exe bash -l -c 'rm -rf /tmp/{.X*,dbus*,orbit*,*

Re: xterm title setting breaks when upgrading from 32-bit to 64-bit cygwin

2013-08-01 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 01/08/2013 01:55, Jeremy Elson wrote: > I recently upgraded from the 32-bit to the 64-bit build of Cygwin > 1.7.22 on Windows 8 x64. For the most part, everything works > identically (except faster!). But I have noticed one problem: xterm no > longer seems to respond to the magic escape codes th

Re: xterm title setting breaks when upgrading from 32-bit to 64-bit cygwin

2013-08-01 Thread Jeremy Elson
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 01/08/2013 01:55, Jeremy Elson wrote: > > I recently upgraded from the 32-bit to the 64-bit build of Cygwin > > 1.7.22 on Windows 8 x64. For the most part, everything works > > identically (except faster!). But I have noticed one problem: xte

Re: Cygwin 1.7.22 calls dumper when starting X

2013-08-01 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Charles Wilson wrote: (I'm not sure why you need & at all; unless it allows the bash shell to exit, where otherwise it would hang around?) Without the "&", there is an extra bash process running: I want just to start XWin... See attached. > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";;

Re: Cygwin 1.7.22 calls dumper when starting X

2013-08-01 Thread Mark Hansen
See below... On 8/1/2013 2:33 PM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: >> (I'm not sure why you need & at all; unless it allows the bash shell to >> exit, where otherwise it would hang around?) > > Without the "&", there is an extra bash process running: I want just to > start XWin...