On 01/03/2015 03:03 AM, Laurens Blankers wrote:
On 3-1-2015 04:48, Larry Hall (Cygwin-X) wrote:
But the functionality in the latest release of the xinit corrects some
long-standing Cygwin incompatibilities with startx, so there's
no benefit to turning back as a strategy.
This is exactly why I h
On January 3, 2015 12:03:58 AM PST, Laurens Blankers
wrote:
>I am not arguing that the solution should be discarded, I am arguing
>that the way the transition was handled, or not handled actually, it
>not
>worthy of being called engineering, development, or even programming.
Strong words, but
On 3-1-2015 04:48, Larry Hall (Cygwin-X) wrote:
> But the functionality in the latest release of the xinit corrects some
> long-standing Cygwin incompatibilities with startx, so there's
> no benefit to turning back as a strategy.
This is exactly why I have such hard time convincing people that usin
