> From: Christopher Faylor
>
> The historical reasons for [un?]merging the cygwin and
> cygwin-xfree lists no longer seems to exist so I am
> contemplating merging the two lists.
For us old-timers, what were the historical reasons again, and why/how did
they go away?
--
Gar
[snip]
> > 1) How many of our BDs actually work for Red Hat anymore?
>
> 1 (one)
>
Harold also stated:
"Look, it has been made quite clear to us on several occasions that Red Hat
doesn't pay for anyone in their company to do development on Cygwin[...]"
Is this co
Ok, whatever snapshot this is:
"1.5.19s(0.138/4/2) 20050914 20:32:51"
Configures, builds, and installs a working wxWidgets here (same wxW's cvs as
yesterday).
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: ht
that this is
> tedious
Not for much longer, if a certain googly-eyed letter of the alphabet has
anything to say about it!
[snip]
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
you Brian Dessent.
Dude, you just sent a half-megabyte email to all of Cygwin-land. That isn't
going to make you any friends with folks on dialup.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Charles
No problems here, but my network usage with Cygwin is pretty much limited to
cvs (client) and wget these days. Autotools, gcc, and friends seem to have
no problems.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle