RE: Windows XP SP2 - anybody tried it yet?

2004-08-18 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Charles No problems here, but my network usage with Cygwin is pretty much limited to cvs (client) and wget these days. Autotools, gcc, and friends seem to have no problems. -- Gary R. Van Sickle

RE: compile in cygwin (can't create configure file)

2005-03-08 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
you Brian Dessent. Dude, you just sent a half-megabyte email to all of Cygwin-land. That isn't going to make you any friends with folks on dialup. -- Gary R. Van Sickle

RE: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

2005-09-14 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
that this is > tedious Not for much longer, if a certain googly-eyed letter of the alphabet has anything to say about it! [snip] -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

RE: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

2005-09-14 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Ok, whatever snapshot this is: "1.5.19s(0.138/4/2) 20050914 20:32:51" Configures, builds, and installs a working wxWidgets here (same wxW's cvs as yesterday). -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: ht

RE: Consensus about man and doc X11 directory structure

2005-10-11 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
[snip] > > 1) How many of our BDs actually work for Red Hat anymore? > > 1 (one) > Harold also stated: "Look, it has been made quite clear to us on several occasions that Red Hat doesn't pay for anyone in their company to do development on Cygwin[...]" Is this co

RE: cygwin and cygwin-xfree lists to merge

2008-12-11 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> From: Christopher Faylor > > The historical reasons for [un?]merging the cygwin and > cygwin-xfree lists no longer seems to exist so I am > contemplating merging the two lists. For us old-timers, what were the historical reasons again, and why/how did they go away? -- Gar