Hi.
As described in the first posting of Cannot recompile X, I also
compiled a debug build of X. For this, I ran ./config/util/makeg.sh
World.
When I now run startx to start the debug build of X, it seems to
ignore my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. I think so, because if it would load
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi.
As described in the first posting of Cannot recompile X, I also
compiled a debug build of X. For this, I ran ./config/util/makeg.sh
World.
When I now run startx to start the debug build of X, it seems to
ignore my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi.
As described in the first posting of Cannot recompile X, I also
compiled a debug build of X. For this, I ran ./config/util/makeg.sh
World.
When I now run startx to start the debug build of X, it seems to
ignore my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. I think so, because if it would
Alexander Gottwald schrieb:
What does the logfile tell?
/tmp/XWin.log:
ddxProcessArgument () - Initializing default screens
winInitializeDefaultScreens () - w 1600 h 1200
_XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root
winDetectSupportedEngines () - Windows NT/2000
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Alexander Gottwald schrieb:
What does the logfile tell?
/tmp/XWin.log:
ddxProcessArgument () - Initializing default screens
winInitializeDefaultScreens () - w 1600 h 1200
_XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root
Alexander Gottwald schrieb:
This seems to be an old version. Are these CVS sources?
No. Just like back in November 2002, I used X420.
Alexander Skwar
--
/*
* For moronic filesystems that do not allow holes in file.
* We may have to extend the file.
*/
2.4.0-test2
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Alexander Gottwald schrieb:
This seems to be an old version. Are these CVS sources?
No. Just like back in November 2002, I used X420.
4.2.0 had no configfile support
Use the CVS sources. They include a lot of fixes and changes since 4.2.0
BTW: today 4.3.0 was
Which branch did you checkout? Did you get the default branch (would
have XF86Config support) or the 4.2.0 branch (would not have XF86Config
support)?
Harold
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi.
As described in the first posting of Cannot recompile X, I also
compiled a debug build of X. For this, I
Let me sum this up: I compiled Microsoft Windows 3.1 but it doesn't have
Internet Explorer 6.0... what happened? Get it?
Harold
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Alexander Gottwald schrieb:
This seems to be an old version. Are these CVS sources?
No. Just like back in November 2002, I used X420.
So sprach Harold L Hunt II am 2003-02-27 um 11:47:56 -0500 :
Let me sum this up: I compiled Microsoft Windows 3.1 but it doesn't have
Internet Explorer 6.0... what happened? Get it?
Yes. I'm getting Xfree86 4.3.0 now - hopefully I'm a little more
successful with the new release ;)
and it
10 matches
Mail list logo