On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:17:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A configure / make /make install that has been working successfully oob for
a long time recently failed. the relevant .tgz is unaltered, only Cygwin has
changed. Does the following output from make, throw any light on this? The
A configure / make /make install that has been working successfully oob for
a long time recently failed. the relevant .tgz is unaltered, only Cygwin has
changed. Does the following output from make, throw any light on this? The
configure worked fine. I attach cygcheck.out.
Fergus
~/tmp/grap-1.30
Fergus,
This is a general Cygwin question, not a Cygwin/XFree86 question. It
should have been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I happen to know the answer you want to hear. The problem is
that 'flex' 2.5.31-1 sucks; it can't build anything in the XFree86 tree.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:58:23AM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Fergus,
This is a general Cygwin question, not a Cygwin/XFree86 question. It
should have been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I happen to know the answer you want to hear. The problem is
that 'flex'
flex 2.5.31-1 sucks ...
... upgrade to 2.5.4-2.
Well this worked just fine. Thank you very much for this pragmatic help.
Fergus
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:58:23AM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Fergus,
This is a general Cygwin question, not a Cygwin/XFree86 question. It
should have been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I happen to know the answer you want to hear.
Fergus,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
flex 2.5.31-1 sucks ...
... upgrade to 2.5.4-2.
Well this worked just fine. Thank you very much for this pragmatic help.
Fergus
No problem. Of course, we will both be out of luck when 2.5.4 is no
longer available. I was thinking that 2.5.4 was newer, but
Howdy,
At 03:48 PM 9/25/2003 -0400, CGF wrote:
...Just so it's clear: I don't care to get involved in fixing issues where
the bug report is something is horribly wrong with it, either, so if
you do actually want to work on fixing it, then I'll need more to go on
than I have been given and I'll
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 05:22:10PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:58:23AM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Just
so it's clear: I don't care to get involved in fixing issues where the
bug report is something is horribly wrong with it, either, so if
