Hi!
I am not an expert on bash and sh but I could only make the cygwin-sfree-fax
topic 4.7 and 4.8 work with sh, not bash, so I assume it should be corrected
as suggested in my mail below?
Best regards
Arne Hårseth
PS: I do not subscripe to this list.
- Original Message -
From: Harold
Arne,
There's an entry in the main Cygwin FAQ that may be of interest:
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#SEC49.
Igor
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Arne Christian Hårseth wrote:
Hi!
I am not an expert on bash and sh but I could only make the cygwin-sfree-fax
topic 4.7 and 4.8 work with sh, not
Igor,
Is his suggestion correct? If so, I will need to update the
Cygwin/XFree86 FAQ.
Thanks,
Harold
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Arne,
There's an entry in the main Cygwin FAQ that may be of interest:
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#SEC49.
Igor
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Arne Christian Hårseth
Harold,
His suggestion is equivalent to having a .inputrc with the lines he passes
to bind. Two of the options (show-all-if-ambiguous and
expand-tilde) have nothing to do with 8-bit characters, the other three
are the same as in the FAQ entry. In other words, the FAQ entry *is*
correct, and
