RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-05 Thread Earle F. Philhower III
Howdy Andy.. At 02:37 PM 6/4/2003 -0400, you wrote: I did some more testing based on your suggestions. I first tried the XWin-Test91-DEBUG version of the server with the released version of the dll. That failed as before and gave me a new stackdump. I then put in cygwin1-20030602.dll as /bin/cyg

RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-05 Thread Andrew Braverman
2003 12:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 > > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:54:14AM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: > >You did say that and I misread it. I have been looking for > a 1.3.23 package > >and, after checking a half a

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:54:14AM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: >You did say that and I misread it. I have been looking for a 1.3.23 package >and, after checking a half a dozen or so mirrors, have not seen one. Huh? The next version has not been released. Go to the cygwin web site and look fo

RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-05 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
is attached. Thank you again for all the help. > > > > I was talking about the latest CYGWIN DLL, not the latest XWin > > package. > > > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Christopher Faylor > > >> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:44 PM > >

RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-05 Thread Andrew Braverman
Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 > > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:38:52AM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: > >I updated the XWin package to -42 and changed nothing else.

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
IL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Faylor >> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:44 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 >> >>On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:56:19PM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: >>>Sorry. Missed that one. It is

RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-04 Thread Andrew Braverman
7:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 > > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:56:19PM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: > >Sorry. Missed that one. It is attached now. > > Doh. I was hoping that if I saw the cygwin version from the cygcheck >

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:56:19PM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: >Sorry. Missed that one. It is attached now. Doh. I was hoping that if I saw the cygwin version from the cygcheck output I would be able to figure out the stack dump but I've removed the debugging version of cygwin 1.3.22 that I'

RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Andrew Braverman
Sorry. Missed that one. It is attached now. - Andy > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 5:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 &

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:16:48PM -0400, Andrew Braverman wrote: >OK - I tried a few more experiments. I started to experiment outside of my >scripts and got down to: > XWin -multiwindow & >I ran an xterm on the Linux host using ssh >I ran ddd. >Xwin claimed to dump core (though I could not

RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Andrew Braverman
Behalf Of Harold L Hunt II > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 > > > Are you using -clipboard? Try it without using -clipboard. > > Harold > > Andrew Braverman wrote: > > > There is onl

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Harold L Hunt II
debug button, which is when I first see the access violation. Anyone have any other ideas? - Andy -Original Message- From: Harold L Hunt II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 Andrew, Please do a

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Jeremy, Try running without -clipboard and report your results. Harold Jeremy Wilkins wrote: Took a little longer to crash this time :) No STATUS ACCESS VIOLATION - just the 'tell microsoft about this crash' box (I'm running XP). I've attached the XWin.log. I'm launching netscape using 'ssh

RE: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Andrew Braverman
? - Andy > -Original Message- > From: Harold L Hunt II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with releases since -37 > > > Andrew, > > Please do a manual file scan for multiple copies of &

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Jeremy Wilkins
Took a little longer to crash this time :) No STATUS ACCESS VIOLATION - just the 'tell microsoft about this crash' box (I'm running XP). I've attached the XWin.log. I'm launching netscape using 'ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] netscape' jeremy Harold L Hunt II wrote: Jeremy, Jeremy Wilkins wrote: I

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Jeremy, Jeremy Wilkins wrote: I've just updated to -41 (from -34 or -35, can't remember) and find netscape 4.7 (from a solaris box) frequently crashes Xwin. Other apps like emacs, xterm and xclock (from the same solaris box) seem fine. Does it just crash XWin.exe, or does it give the STATUS AC

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Jeremy Wilkins
I've just updated to -41 (from -34 or -35, can't remember) and find netscape 4.7 (from a solaris box) frequently crashes Xwin. Other apps like emacs, xterm and xclock (from the same solaris box) seem fine. jeremy PS: Definately only got one cygwin1.dll Andrew Braverman wrote: I suddenly have a

Re: Problem with releases since -37

2003-06-03 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Andrew, Please do a manual file scan for multiple copies of cygwin1.dll. Don't tell me anything about paths, just do the search and report how many copies you find. For more info specific to this problem, see the following FAQ entry: http://xfree86.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-xfree-faq.html#q-