One additional idea came to my mind. You could use lbxproxy to reduce
the amount of data your X11 connection needs, as cygwin/X has the lbx
extension.
Bye
Holger Krull
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Digital Infra, Inc. wrote:
> >> 2. reconnection.
> >>Current Cygwin/X is not stable. often crashes.
> >>it is okay. I believe you fix it in the future.
> >>but I can not re-connect it ... this is very serious problem.
> >
> >This answers the question.
> >The missin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Digital Infra, Inc.
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Reconnection and performance.
>
>
> >> 1. Slow.
> >>W
>> 1. Slow.
>>Why VNC is sometimes faster?.
>>I ask you that the milestone of improving Cygwin performance.
>
>Are you aware of the fundamental differences between a X11 Server and a
>Remote Desktop like VNC?
>
Hopefully so. and this is the reason I wonder why Cygwin/X is slower.
VNC doe
1. Slow.
Why VNC is sometimes faster?.
I ask you that the milestone of improving Cygwin performance.
Are you aware of the fundamental differences between a X11 Server and a
Remote Desktop like VNC?
2. reconnection.
Current Cygwin/X is not stable. often crashes.
it is okay. I believe y