Reconnection and performance.

2004-05-24 Thread Digital Infra, Inc.
Sorry, Everyone. and I respect your opinion, Faylor. maybe this is not a proper place to discuss coLinux specialized issue, even it is related to Cygwin/X. but how about Cygwin/X issue itself, even it is related to coLinux? We, coLinux team found mainly two problem to adopt Cygwin/X for coLinux

Re: Reconnection and performance.

2004-05-25 Thread Holger Krull
1. Slow. Why VNC is sometimes faster?. I ask you that the milestone of improving Cygwin performance. Are you aware of the fundamental differences between a X11 Server and a Remote Desktop like VNC? 2. reconnection. Current Cygwin/X is not stable. often crashes. it is okay. I believe y

Re: Reconnection and performance.

2004-05-26 Thread Digital Infra, Inc.
>> 1. Slow. >>Why VNC is sometimes faster?. >>I ask you that the milestone of improving Cygwin performance. > >Are you aware of the fundamental differences between a X11 Server and a >Remote Desktop like VNC? > Hopefully so. and this is the reason I wonder why Cygwin/X is slower. VNC doe

RE: Reconnection and performance.

2004-05-26 Thread Denny Figuerres
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Digital Infra, Inc. > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Reconnection and performance. > > > >> 1. Slow. > >>W

Re: Reconnection and performance.

2004-05-26 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Digital Infra, Inc. wrote: > >> 2. reconnection. > >>Current Cygwin/X is not stable. often crashes. > >>it is okay. I believe you fix it in the future. > >>but I can not re-connect it ... this is very serious problem. > > > >This answers the question. > >The missin

Re: Reconnection and performance.

2004-05-28 Thread Holger Krull
One additional idea came to my mind. You could use lbxproxy to reduce the amount of data your X11 connection needs, as cygwin/X has the lbx extension. Bye Holger Krull