Earle,
Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
Howdy Harold,
At 12:00 AM 3/26/2004 -0500, Harold wrote:
Nope, not going to beat you to it. This issue is what I was referring
to when I said that Earle should probably look at the PixmapBytePad
patch to make sure it was complete. :)
There's a saying I
Howdy Harold,
At 12:00 AM 3/26/2004 -0500, Harold wrote:
Nope, not going to beat you to it. This issue is what I was referring to
when I said that Earle should probably look at the PixmapBytePad patch to
make sure it was complete. :)
There's a saying I've learned from my verification engineers
Earle,
Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
Howdy Fabrizio,
At 09:34 AM 3/25/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I tried version 4.3.0-60 and it worked without crashing in 24bpp mode.
There
is a minor glitch left: in 24bpp mode, the icon at the upper left corner
has wrong colours, while the colours are right in 1
Howdy Fabrizio,
At 09:34 AM 3/25/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I tried version 4.3.0-60 and it worked without crashing in 24bpp mode. There
is a minor glitch left: in 24bpp mode, the icon at the upper left corner
has wrong colours, while the colours are right in 16bpp mode. I'm sending
you PNG files to s
Hi All,
It seems that this may have been resolved already, but FWIW...
Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
> To fix it we can reinstate the if()...
> > if (pixmap->drawable.bitsPerPixel == 15)
> > effXBPP = 16;
> > else
> > effXBPP = pixmap->drawable.bitsPerPixel;
> > if (pixmap->dra
>Thanks for the good debug Fabrizio!
You're welcome!
>The 24bpp icon handling was
>something I never could test: I couldn't find any apps that had
>24bpp icons, all I found were 1- 15-, 16-, or 32-bit ones.
>I was assuming the X server always used a packed format, but
>PixmapBytePad() looks to be
Rob,
Thanks for the test. I was hoping that this fix would resolve most of
the weird crashing problems we have been having.
Harold
Rob Foehl wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Fabrizio,
It looks like your conclusions are correct.
I have included your suggested change in XF
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Fabrizio,
>
> It looks like your conclusions are correct.
>
> I have included your suggested change in XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-60. Please
> test this on a 24 bit depth system. It seems to work okay on 32 bit
> depth systems.
I tested this with the Orac
Howdy Harold...
At 10:17 PM 3/23/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Upon closer inspection I think you'll see that the logic of the statements
is unchanged. I was working on adding an additional case for 24-bpp and
reworked the if/else pairs to more a "set default/override default it
needed" structure. Lo
Earle,
Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
Howdy Fabrizio, Harold.
Thanks for the good debug Fabrizio! The 24bpp icon handling was
something I never could test: I couldn't find any apps that had
24bpp icons, all I found were 1- 15-, 16-, or 32-bit ones.
I was assuming the X server always used a packe
Howdy Fabrizio, Harold.
Thanks for the good debug Fabrizio! The 24bpp icon handling was
something I never could test: I couldn't find any apps that had
24bpp icons, all I found were 1- 15-, 16-, or 32-bit ones.
I was assuming the X server always used a packed format, but
PixmapBytePad() looks to
Fabrizio,
It looks like your conclusions are correct.
I have included your suggested change in XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-60. Please
test this on a 24 bit depth system. It seems to work okay on 32 bit
depth systems.
I checked the change into CVS as well. I think that Earle should
probably take a
12 matches
Mail list logo