Matt Wozniski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Paul McFerrin wrote:
excuse this test, it *should* get rejected
The cygwin lists are public, anyone can post to them even if not
subscribed. This wasn't a useful test to see if your unsubscribe
worked.
Indeed! There is also no r
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Paul McFerrin wrote:
> excuse this test, it *should* get rejected
The cygwin lists are public, anyone can post to them even if not
subscribed. This wasn't a useful test to see if your unsubscribe
worked.
~Matt
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwi
excuse this test, it *should* get rejected
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/