-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:59:51PM -0700, petro wrote:
>
> >> That's true, but it is irrelevant. As long as insurance companies
> >> and hospitals are privately owned, putting a requirement like this
> >> one on them constitutes theft of their re
At 10:35 PM -0700 10/22/00, Nathan Saper wrote:
>
>This is true in theory. However, from what I have read, it appears
>that the care given to these people is far from the quality of care
>given to those who can pay. Also, many diseases require very
>expensive treatments, and I do not believe the
- Original Message -
From: petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The point is that you are *forcing* me to part with my
> productive labor to support someone else.
>
> This makes me unhappy. Under your beliefs, you can't do this,
> as I have a right to be happy.
If this were an episode on the ori
>
> Of course, in the libertarian ideal universe someone not
>completely indigent who had a genetic condition that made them high risk
>might still be unable to get any kind of catastropic medical insurance
>and might be wiped out of virtually all assets by a serious illness,
>even one comp
>> That's true, but it is irrelevant. As long as insurance companies
>> and hospitals are privately owned, putting a requirement like this
>> one on them constitutes theft of their resources. If you want to
>> have them engaging in charity, set up a charity and solicit money
>> instead. i
Hello,
Thank you for your interest in eGroups, a free email group
service. To activate your account with eGroups, we need to
verify that your email address is correct. To protect your email
address, your account will not be activated until you follow one
of the confirmation steps below:
1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 12:59:08AM -0400, Me wrote:
> From: "Nathan Saper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > However, I think most people would be willing to vote for a
> bill that
> > would guarantee insurance for people with genetic
> abnormalities, even
>
>
At 6:20 AM +0200 10/23/00, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>[Fwd]
>
>For anyone in the SF Bay Area who is even mildly interested in the privacy
>discussion, I highly recommend that you attend a public affairs-style
>discussion on Internet privacy to be held at The Commonwealth Club on
>Thursday, October 26, f
[Fwd]
For anyone in the SF Bay Area who is even mildly interested in the privacy
discussion, I highly recommend that you attend a public affairs-style
discussion on Internet privacy to be held at The Commonwealth Club on
Thursday, October 26, from 5:15 -- 7:15pm.
The discussion will be moderated
At 2:44 PM -0700 10/22/00, Greg Broiles wrote:
>At 12:33 AM 10/22/00 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:
>>
So these people are entitled to something for nothing?
(or in this case, $1500 of treatment for $1000 of premiums)?
>>>
>>>That's the whole ide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 08:12:45PM -0700, James A.. Donald wrote:
> At 07:09 PM 10/22/2000 -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> > I think the government has a right to do whatever it needs to do to
> > maintain the health and well-being of its population.
At 08:12 PM 10/22/00 -0700, James A.. Donald wrote:
> --
>At 07:09 PM 10/22/2000 -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> > I think the government has a right to do whatever it needs to do to
> > maintain the health and well-being of its population. That is the
> > purpose of the government.
>
>Then the
GET YOUR OWN 100 MEG WEBSITE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH TODAY!
STOP PAYING $19.95 or more TODAY for your web site, WHEN YOU CAN
GET ONE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH!
DO YOU ALREADY HAVE A WEBSITE? ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS TRANSFER THE
DOMAIN TO OUR SERVERS AND UPLOAD YOUR DATA AND YOU ARE READY TO
G
<<< No Message Collected >>>
At 12:33 AM 10/22/00 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:
>
> >> So these people are entitled to something for nothing?
> >> (or in this case, $1500 of treatment for $1000 of premiums)?
> >
> >That's the whole idea of insurance, isn't it?
> >
>
>You're trolling, ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 12:33:39AM -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:
>
> >> So these people are entitled to something for nothing?
> >> (or in this case, $1500 of treatment for $1000 of premiums)?
> >
> >Tha
::
Anon post to news.cableinet.co.uk.alt.test
-- *
help
*
winmail.dat
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:
>The point is, it's not fair to punish someone for a genetic defect
>that isn't his or her fault.
What has fairness got to do with it? People are born with genetic
defects; it's manifestly unfair, but it's true. Insurers are in
business to make mo
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:
>> So these people are entitled to something for nothing?
>> (or in this case, $1500 of treatment for $1000 of premiums)?
>
>That's the whole idea of insurance, isn't it?
>
You're trolling, aren't you?
Insurance is a good idea for the insured because
19 matches
Mail list logo
