> Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> >
> > > Jay:
> > >
> > > I've given information which is readily available to anyone who
> > > takes the time to investigate it.
> >
> > But you have failled to provide information which should be
> > readily available to you if you are telling the truth.
> >
> >
>
> > If it was 'officially set forth'
> > one would think you could produce quotes
> > rather than paraphrases.
> >
> > And maybe name the correct organization.
> > (NCGO doesn't seem to exist, if Altavista is anything to go by)
>
> Try looking under the protocols of the elders of Zion.
All
> In 1972 (the year before the APA unilaterally decided
> homosexuality was "no longer an illness") the Gay Rights Platform was
> drawn up at the convention of the National Coalition of Gay Organizers.
> It was officially set forth at the Gay Pride March on Washington, D.C.
> on April 25, 199
> I knew there was a reason I printed out NAMBLA's website
> throughout the years. Maybe I should contact this child's parents as
> well as their attorney. Maybe you should do the same. Maybe you really
You definitely should.
A quick email from anybody on this list and your printout
> [A veteran free speech activist in Cambridge, Mass. sent me this. Any
> offers of mirroring should go to the list, where I assume they'll be duly
> forwarded. I wonder how long the HTML files in question here would last on
> a Geocities/etc account. --Declan]
>
Did Curley's lawyers at least
> At 11:27 AM -0400 9/13/00, Jay Holovacs wrote:
> >You really don't seem to get it, defending the right to speech is NOT the
> >same as defending the content (though I understand that nowhere do they
> >advocate violence to children)
> >
> >Remember, Jodi, the *same* law that should be protecting
