to cause cancer, and the dirt underneath old transformers,
should those transformers have become leaky, is probably adequately
tainted, and already needs clean up anyway. Impound a few ounces of
alleyway dirt with the car.
Then you're doing the planet a Service. Boxing up preexisting cont
You try to be civil, you get threatened.
I guess I learned my lesson. Last one turned out to be reasonable.
Good luck,
Sean Roach
By the way, is the shift Only used for emphasis these days? What about
punctuation? Is there a corrollary to usage of punctuation,
capitalization, and
At 03:13 PM 10/9/2000, ziad salim wrote:
>
>
Are the infiltrators getting this desparate for a bust?
Good luck,
Sean
At 12:36 PM 10/5/2000, Tim May wrote:
>You need to think very carefully about why it is you think that the
>socialist sentiments, and the blather about profits belonging to the
>laborers, are "beautiful" or "compelling." They are not. They are flawed
>for many reasons, and not at all 'beautifu
ns in general, than there could ever be
lazy wealthy persons.
I seem to remember that "Utopia" literally meant "doesn't exist".
>Thus, the definition _cannot_ read:
>
>*-The capitalist is one who opposes the exploitation of man by man.
>
>because exploitation is build directly into the system. A better
>definition is:
>
>*_The capitalist is one who exploits the labor of others for personal
>profit by
> virtue of private ownership of productive means!_*
I'd say a capitalist is one who strives to gain more than he had, by
trading in a market, and in the process produce more, and better methods of
production, since with better methods of production, more can be produced
with the same effort.
I'd hate to have to hoe a row by hand. Tractors are much more efficient.
Can you honestly see any type of industrial revolution occuring from common
labor? If I gain status by developing steam power, then I've just been
elevated to a new class. If I gain profit from the licenses, same deal.
>This is an accurate definition of what it means to be a _capitalist_.
>
>The libertarian socialist model of production revolves around the
>collective or
>the commune, where all workers within the given collective profit
>_equally_ from
>what they produce. *_The ones who actually do the work get the profit_*.
>This is, in
>essence, the core of our economic ideology.
>
>
>Return to the Anarchy for Anybody Homepage.
><http://www.xs4all.org/anarchy/>
This really is unfair, since the original author isn't on the list to
refute. But I'm sure he, (or she), will find a worthy champion.
Good luck,
Sean Roach
At 01:24 PM 9/4/2000 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
...
>An interesting point: There are ancient inscriptions in Wales
>that no one has been able to read in modern times. Deciphering
>an unknown langauge, not related to known languages, when it is
>written in an unknown script is a feat of linguist
My error.
Sunder, not Petro.
My apologies to both.
Good luck,
Sean
e ability to read, or to play thier
traditional music. (Bards tended to sing songs counter to the english
policies.) Last I heard, the bagpipe was still considered a weapon.
If I heard right, It became illegal to speak Scottish Gaelic, for a time.
Interestingly enough, all happened for the same reason. To suppress
opposition to the ruling class.
Good luck,
Sean Roach
At 08:39 PM 8/28/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>At 08:56 PM 8/28/00 -0500, you wrote:
>>At 01:27 PM 8/27/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>>>At 12:06 PM 8/25/00 -0400, you wrote:
>>With only one repeater, wouldn't it be possible to "ping" the phone, and
>>determine the distance? From that, and if the tower can g
efence after one is dead is either confused thinking
>or indication of an alterior motive.
Such as disarming the populous, reguardless of actual figures.
Good luck,
Sean Roach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 01:44 PM 7/4/00 -0400, Tim May wrote:
>
>
>At 12:09 PM -0400 7/4/00, dmolnar wrote:
>>Why wouldn't you just shred, melt, and scatter the CD if you want
>>to wipe the info on it? Trying to nondestructively wipe a hard
>>drive makes some sense, becau
At 10:00 AM 6/20/00 -0400, you wrote:
Like I said. I haven't figured out a way around tilt yet. At least not on
a moving ship. I figured that a box like this should almost have a
accelerometer, and gyroscope compass/artificial horizon, as part of the
motherboard. It was just the power outage t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 04:23 PM 6/14/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>At 04:12 PM 6/14/00 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>>What makes anyone think Sealand is outside of the UK's jurisdiction
>>after the government in the 1980s extended their territorial
>>limits to 10 mile
At 06:02 PM 4/22/00 -0400, Dave Emery wrote:
...
> What this means, of course, is that access to the exact location
>of an Onstar equipped vehicle is probably entirely determined by the
>policies and integrity of the Onstar control centers and software - if
>they decide to let a nosey cop lo
At 10:24 PM 4/21/00 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
>
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, I wrote:
>
...
>> For the latter problem, using signals as close to the actual police bands
>> as possible, you could "calibrate" the system. This would be easiest with
>> fixed placement receivers, but not impossible with mobil
I haven't been following the list for a while, so if this cuts into an
older arguement. I apologize.
At 04:45 PM 4/21/00 -0700, Eric Murray wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 04:25:45PM -0600, Pope Golgotha Pierced the Zeroth
wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
>>
...
>You could do th
16 matches
Mail list logo
