On the rijndael page I see this note below the optimized code link :
>IMPORTANT NOTE ! This code was written in order to clarify the
mathematical >description, and to run the statistical test. Without
modification, it should not
>be used to encrypt files, or for any other application.
What exact
Jim Choate wrote :
>On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, John Young wrote:
>
>> But that is trivial compared to your claim that you decide what is
evidence
>> and that it then becomes illegal to alter or destroy it. That appears
to be
>> playing cop without the authority.
>
>No John, that is not my claim. You wish
I've got sources kicking around somewhere that do this with noise
patterns in monochrome bitmaps. I'm not sure if the effect using ascii
is achieved in the exact same way - no doubt it is very closely related
but not as dense as the bitmaps.
Mike
>
>Well, not crypto but stego.
>
>I was looking fo
It's a top-down problem. They're only doing what they believe is their
job as defined by their controllers. These sort of events just show what
those in power think of their fellow citizens. Expect it to get worse if
we get a Republican-controlled government and the resulting Republican
Supreme Co
The Canine Excrement Effect : whereupon having stepped squarely into a
fresh heap, the weary traveller experiences an epiphany and declares,
"whether it's on my right foot or my left is irrelevant, it's foul and
it stinks" then proceeds to perform an erratic twisting, sliding dance
across the gras
Wouldn't the time of the hack be pretty well known and wouldn't the RPI
firewall logs be timestamped or am I naive?
Is knowledge being used as evidence of guilt?
Mike
>Andres Salomon, a fairly clued in RPI student, heard on
> IRC that the Yankees website had been hacked. He
> checked it out, no
> Bush Calls Administration Encryption Policy "Outdated"
> Responding to a question about encryption technology in an
ongoing
> Internet debate, Texas Gov. George W. Bush castigated President
Clinton
> and Vice President Gore for what he called "outdated" technology
policy.
> "The Clinton adm
Amusing.
>Here is my last post in this thread, because I feel that it is going
>nowhere:
>
Isn't that a CP thread hallmark? Is this a preview of item 2) ?
>My views are irreconcilable with those of the libertarians on this
>list. Here's the way I view the world:
>
> 1) Life has no inheren
