I really find AP depressing. I find the arguments that it would only
be used against 'those that needed killing' faulty, in that everyone
has a different list. There are a lot of folk who would put crypto
anarchists on their list (as well as, say, Major League Baseball
umpires :-).
"Law", and 'l
At 10:14 AM 11/24/00 -0800, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
>
>On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>
>
>>would most likely cast a couple new protection laws. say, make it
>>illegal to publish a politician's name. "our president has today..."
>
>
>Well, I guess that's *one* way to get political types to su
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Greg Newby wrote:
>
>Do people on this list really believe that the solution to
>problems is to kill people?
>
>Or are we just getting sarcastic and frustrated?
There are certain problems that no other solution for has ever
been found. There has never been a human soci
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>would most likely cast a couple new protection laws. say, make it
>illegal to publish a politician's name. "our president has today..."
Well, I guess that's *one* way to get political types to support
the right to anonymity...
petro wrote:
>
> >Oh come now. You have real recourse against Bill Gates and John Tesh
>
> Bill Gates is a questionable case, but there is no doubt that
> John Tesh should die.
if everyone who hates windos puts $10 in a box, you'd need quite a large
box. which makes one wonder why the
>Anyway, the distinction between business and politics is less clear than
>you make out - or seems less clear to many people in countries outside
>America. In most places the government is in the pockets of the people
>with the money - and in most places presidents and governors are quick
This is
Eric Cordian wrote:
> Alan Olsen wrote:
[...snip...]
> > He seemed to think that the only target of this would be the government.
>
> I think this is a reasonable observation. You really have to be acting
> under color of authority to strongly alienate enough people, who have so
> litle recour
>Oh come now. You have real recourse against Bill Gates and John Tesh
Bill Gates is a questionable case, but there is no doubt that
John Tesh should die.
>It is extremely unlikely it is going to change in the least the "who" or
>"why" of contract killing. I really don't think everyon
- Original Message -
From: "Duncan Frissell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I hope James will argue that he was gathering addresses so
> that he could picket them (which is legal).
Hasn't Jim Bell, master chemist, keeper of paper notes, and self
appointed angel of death to LEOs ever heard of a con
Alan Olsen wrote:
> I disagree. I don't believe Jim really was willing to consider
> the social implications of his scheme.
The implications are that in a society where the government has not made
personal privacy and private communication illegal, you can't be an
asshole to countless millions
10 matches
Mail list logo
