This thing has occasioned an untoward measure of shock, for the
fact is the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do provide for it,
see Rule 34, in appropriate circumstances--the argument should be
whether the circumstances are appropriate.
MacN
And everything the Feds do is correct? Both
In v03130301b4cfcc0e251a@[207.111.241.227], on 02/15/00
at 07:46 PM, Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Of course, no Feds have ever done a day in jail for violating the ECPA.
When has a Fed gone to jail for violating any law? Last I recall was Liddy
et. al. back during Watergate. When Feds
At 11:07 AM -0800 2/15/00, Duncan Frissell wrote:
A further thought. "Your Honor, the ECPA limits my ability to comply with
your order. I can't turn over any electronic communications without a
warrant and the warrant has to identify specific messages. I don't want to
end up in federal
Northwest Airlines last week began
court-authorized searches of the home
computers of flight attendants whom the airline
suspects organized a sick-out over the New
Year's holiday. Two computer forensic experts,
hired by Northwest, seized the computers of a
They didn't seize his computers. He
Again, these people permitted the search under threat from a court order
but they could have resisted.
One possibility - "I am not saying whether or not I own any computers
(actually printouts or digital storage media) or where they are - prove I
do you copraphaegic cretins."
I'd love to
From:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/feb2000/nwa-f11.shtml
Date: 2/14/00
Time: 8:41:33 AM
Remote Name: 205.188.192.174
Comments
WSWS : Workers Struggles : Airlines
Action against dissidents in airline contract
struggle
US court orders seizure of Northwest flight
attendants' home
