>I wrote much of what you quoted and then responded to, and yet you snipped
>the part that said "Tim May wrote..."
>
>
>Please take some care in how you quote.
Apologies.
--
A quote from Petro's Archives: **
If the courts started interpret
At 3:59 PM -0800 2/20/00, Petro wrote:
>>At 7:45 AM -0800 2/14/00, Duncan Frissell wrote:
>>>At 08:55 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
I wrote much of what you quoted and then responded to, and yet you snipped
the part that said "Tim May wrote..."
Please take some care in how you quote.
--Tim
>At 7:45 AM -0800 2/14/00, Duncan Frissell wrote:
>>At 08:55 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
>> Or will bother to look in the future.
>>
>>> What is considered legal/moral/rational today *might* change in
>>> the future. Do you really want to take that chance?
>>>
>>> It's
PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 1:38 AM
Subject: CDR: Re: Neo-Cypherpunks and calls for privacy regulations
>on 2000-02-14 12:23, Tim May at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> * the desire for a profit almost always wins out over the desire to
collect
>> customer info
At 11:29 PM -0800 2/14/00, John A. Limpert wrote:
>on 2000-02-14 12:23, Tim May at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> * the desire for a profit almost always wins out over the desire to collect
>> customer information: if a business has a choice between collecting some
>> customer info or completing a
on 2000-02-14 12:23, Tim May at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * the desire for a profit almost always wins out over the desire to collect
> customer information: if a business has a choice between collecting some
> customer info or completing a sale, it will take the sale every time.
> (Unless othe
At 7:45 AM -0800 2/14/00, Duncan Frissell wrote:
>At 08:55 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
> Or will bother to look in the future.
>
>> What is considered legal/moral/rational today *might* change in
>> the future. Do you really want to take that chance?
>>
>> It's a lot ea
