At 08:56 AM 12/1/00 -0800, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>Yes, different. alt.anonymous.messages is simply a message mix.
>I'm talking about a system that would provide lots of encrypted
>traffic *ON THE SAME PORTS* as whatever other encrypted traffic
>you were sending. IOW, no one should be able to
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
>> Ray Dillinger[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote
>>
>> I think that what we really need is some kind of NNTP-like system
>> that distributes encrypted packets instead of cleartext ones. If
>> you want to baffle traffic analysis, just create a system wh
> Ray Dillinger[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote
>
> I think that what we really need is some kind of NNTP-like system
> that distributes encrypted packets instead of cleartext ones. If
> you want to baffle traffic analysis, just create a system where
> they can't tell the difference between yo
I think that what we really need is some kind of NNTP-like system
that distributes encrypted packets instead of cleartext ones. If
you want to baffle traffic analysis, just create a system where
they can't tell the difference between your emails and tons and
tons of news traffic.
It's not
