Fellow Cypherpunks,
THE LAWYER GAMBIT
I remember reading in old anti-IRS literature about a technique for
avoiding prosecutions. A client would tell a lawyer that he wanted to
do something and would ask if it were legal to do. The lawyer would
then give his opinion as to
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Gary Jeffers wrote:
then give his opinion as to wheather it was legal or not. If the lawyer
said that it was legal and gave his opinion in writing, then the
client could proceed without out worry. The lawyer's opinion would stop
any criminal prosecution.
Does this
Adam Back wrote:
The US export regulations no longer prevent export of crypto. PGP
exported binary copies of PGP from US websites, as now do many other
companies. Crypto source is exported also from numerous web sites.
I don't follow why all the discussion talking as if ITAR and EARs were
Fellow Cypherpunks,
I was aware that posting binary/executables of crypt code from the
U.S. was illegal. Is source posting of crypt from U.S. illegal too?
Yours Truly,
Gary Jeffers
BEAT STATE
_
Get Your Private, Free
