Fellow Cypherpunks,
I was aware that posting binary/executables of crypt code from the
U.S. was illegal. Is source posting of crypt from U.S. illegal too?
Yours Truly,
Gary Jeffers
BEAT STATE
_
Get Your Private, Free
Fellow Cypherpunks,
THE LAWYER GAMBIT
I remember reading in old anti-IRS literature about a technique for
avoiding prosecutions. A client would tell a lawyer that he wanted to
do something and would ask if it were legal to do. The lawyer would
then give his opinion as to
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Gary Jeffers wrote:
> then give his opinion as to wheather it was legal or not. If the lawyer
> said that it was legal and gave his opinion in writing, then the
> client could proceed without out worry. The lawyer's opinion would stop
> any criminal prosecution.
Does this r
ts own rules. But I've
got a solution to that problem.
Jim Bell
- Original Message -
From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 15:34 PM
Subject: Re: RC4 source as a literate program
> At 1:28 PM -0500 9/5/00, Gar
Adam Back wrote:
>The US export regulations no longer prevent export of crypto. PGP
>exported binary copies of PGP from US websites, as now do many other
>companies. Crypto source is exported also from numerous web sites.
>
>I don't follow why all the discussion talking as if ITAR and EARs were
