> "Tim" == Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tim> Those who wish to protect their identities should take positive
Tim> measures to do so.
Now there's an idea: using cypherpunk technology to enforce one's
privacy.
I momentarily thought that I was reading a thread on cypherpunks that
wa
At 1:33 PM -0700 10/17/00, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Galt wrote:
>
>>Cypherpunks is archived? Isn't that against what most cypherpunks stand
>>for? I know it sets up a "style fingerprint" attack against anonymity...
>
>Do you imagi
2 matches
Mail list logo
