Here's the source for the data preservation requirement:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/COEFAQs.htm
Preservation is not a new idea; it has been the law in
the United States for nearly five years. 18 U.S.C. 2703(f)
requires an electronic communications service provider to
"take all
Jim Choate wrote:
>
>Actually your cite is the wrong one. It has nothing to do with a court
>issuance. There has never been a question in that regard. As I said in a
>earlier note, destruction of evidence is a crime which is well covered. As
>soon as you have any reason to believe it's evidence (a
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 07:05:37PM -0500, John Young wrote:
> The lilly-livered sys admins who betray people's trust in their systems
> are a plague on the Internet, all braying about the need to secure their
> systems from bad users, and all of them -- along with their bosses
> and investors who
Use PGP.
If you want to blab without being traced, go to the local public library
or netcafe. Some airports now have netcafe's that accept cash without
ID.
As a sysadmin, I often have to troubleshoot mail. That exposes me to
email. I try only to look at headers and ignore bodies, but I am
still
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 07:22:30PM -0500, Greg Newby wrote:
>
> Bottom line, as usual, is to trust no-one, including ISPs
> or sysadmins that have a strong privacy ethic.
On the web sites that I maintain, I have a stated policy that we
intend to challenge subpoenas for our web logs and user data
Tim May wrote:
>
> At 1:41 PM +0100 12/8/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
> >Me wrote:
>
> In English it is preferable to write "I wrote," though "Me wrote" is
> honored in some subcultures.
that part is put in automatically by netscape. I don't usually add
obvious statements like "look, I can write" to my
At 12:45 PM +0100 12/11/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Tim May wrote:
>>
>> At 1:41 PM +0100 12/8/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
>> >Me wrote:
>>
>> In English it is preferable to write "I wrote," though "Me wrote" is
>> honored in some subcultures.
>
>that part is put in automatically by netscape. I don't usually
> Tom Vogt[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> the muslim veil, on the other hand, IS a sharp boundary. as I understand
> it, it is NOT permisable to lift it in public under ANY circumstances.
>
> rounding that up, I'd guess that if we were religious about our privacy,
> things may be different (possib
Me wrote:
> > that would be interesting to watch. for those people, the
> > "masquerade" is NON optional, and - as I understand it
> > - they simply can't give in. contrary to all the internet
> privacy,
> > where we are unwilling to give in to even more privacy being
> > taken away, but we CAN
>
"Trei, Peter" wrote:
> > rounding that up, I'd guess that if we were religious about our privacy,
> > things may be different (possibly just more ugly, but who knows).
> >
> Be careful about making sweeping generalizations about Islamic cultures;
> they vary almost as much as Christian and Jewish
At 1:41 PM +0100 12/8/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Me wrote:
In English it is preferable to write "I wrote," though "Me wrote" is
honored in some subcultures.
>
> > if i were to cloak my desire for privacy in the words of the
>> Great Squid, would it be more legitimate?
>
>does it matter?
>
>the point
Tim May wrote:
> Lighten up. It was a joke.
>
> (I even provided a hint, in the "honored in some cultures.")
sorry, I've been working overtime on some stuff here lately, and I was
too tired to get it. also, I'm tired of the nitpicking some people here
exhibit as if there were nothing more import
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Allyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I see masks everywhere during Haloween. Is this illegal?
Probably; most things are. But, as long as you don't confess,
how could it be proven?
13 matches
Mail list logo
