ok, let's try to tackle this problem seriously, for the crypto value (or
lack thereof):
Jim Choate wrote:
> > > What makes 'your friend' an authority?
> >
> > he had the weapon in question in hand pretty much every day for several
> > years.
>
> Yeah, says who? Does your friend even exist? Ev
At 7:39 PM -1000 1/12/01, Reese wrote:
>At 09:29 AM 1/12/01 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>>At 7:45 AM -0600 1/12/01, Jim Choate wrote:
>>>Go back to the archives and you will find Tim May claiming that ANY HK
>>>rifle with *3 (eg 93 or G3) is a .223 whereas the *1's (eg 91) are .308.
>>>When in fact the
At 7:45 AM -0600 1/12/01, Jim Choate wrote:
>Go back to the archives and you will find Tim May claiming that ANY HK
>rifle with *3 (eg 93 or G3) is a .223 whereas the *1's (eg 91) are .308.
>When in fact the '3 means .223' applied ONLY to the '90' (ie 91 or 93)
>class weapons. The reality (which T
Tim May wrote:
> And as relates to Choate's "I was right" point, repeated again
> recently, the G3 in use by the German army was most definitely a 7.62
> mm, i.e., a .308 Winchester. It was _not_ the 5.56 mm variant, at
> least not for wide use. (I say this because quibblers like Choate
> like to
[Sent this morning, 1/11, to algebra.com address. Not received as of
11 hours later. So am sending out to cyberpass.net address.]
At 1:12 PM +0100 1/11/01, Tom wrote:
>Jim Choate wrote:
>> Up until then I thought I did too...I"m not so sure any more.
>>
>> It's not a clone of the HK G3 as it
5 matches
Mail list logo
