On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 03:43:03 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> > You disagree because you just keep cheating. There isn't
> > much to add. Logic isn't about 'agreement' with you, or with the
> > party.
>
> I take this to mean that you don't believe that logic requires
> fundamental assump
https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/clinton-foundation/
×
This should sum it up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2BfqDUPL1I
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:07:52 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
> >> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
> >> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out
> >> > there, and for the US govern
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
>> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
>> > and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
>> > un-American, if not fla
From: Razer
On 10/04/2016 08:07 PM, juan wrote:
>> ...but I don't think the mafia known as 'american government'
>> would agree with that. Subjects, hostages or 'citizens' of the
>> american government are, well, subjected to that mafia. The
>> subjection has little to do with w
From: Shawn K. Quinn
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
>> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
>> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly says
>> so. The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
>> https://en.
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>
> >
> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
> > and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
> > un-American, if not flagrantly
>> The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
>
> A double criminal absurdity. The mafia known as government has
> no real 'jurisdiction' in the territory they usurp, let alone in
> territories 'belonging' to other mafias.
On this, at least, we can agree completely.
The
> You disagree because you just keep cheating. There isn't much
> to add. Logic isn't about 'agreement' with you, or with the
> party.
I take this to mean that you don't believe that logic requires fundamental
assumptions that cannot be proven, but must be agreed upon?
And using
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
"Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>
> I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
> and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
> un-American, if not flagrantly so.
Au contraire. It's 100% american. That's what y
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 20:07 -0700, Razer wrote:
> I was going to bring up the concept that corporate officers (at least)
> are really OWNED by the corporation that employs them and the US
> government probably considers them as 'being in the US' no matter
> where they go as long as they're in the e
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly says
> so. The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritori
On 10/04/2016 08:07 PM, juan wrote:
>
> ...but I don't think the mafia known as 'american government'
> would agree with that. Subjects, hostages or 'citizens' of the
> american government are, well, subjected to that mafia. The
> subjection has little to do with which po
Thanks Wikileaks, Julian, leakers, et al,
for the journalism and the sunshine.
May another 10 years of secrets be set free.
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 02:26:53 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>
> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly
> says so.
> The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
A double criminal absurd
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 01:29:23 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> >
> > You subscribe to that one too? Well no, since scammers,
> > charlatans and intellectual frauds love to hide their scams
> > behind empty, ambiguous words.
> >
> > Anyway, hopefully you got the point. Your 'underst
From: Razer "“Federal law prohibits us from answering your question, and we’re
>currently suing the Justice Department for the ability to disclose more
>information about government requests,” Twitter spokesman Nu Wexler said
>in a statement."
Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not a
It's noted in the article that Twitter did a FISA/FISC Glomar:
"“Federal law prohibits us from answering your question, and we’re
currently suing the Justice Department for the ability to disclose more
information about government requests,” Twitter spokesman Nu Wexler said
in a statement."
On 1
On 10/04/2016 02:30 PM, jim bell wrote:
> Yahoo secretly scanned customer emails for US intelligence-sources
http://dailym.ai/2dOI1gj via http://dailym.ai/android
>
I wonder if the execs who approved this or someone on Y!'s legal team
who advised them to comply is secretly on Google's payroll or
>
> You subscribe to that one too? Well no, since scammers,
> charlatans and intellectual frauds love to hide their scams
> behind empty, ambiguous words.
>
> Anyway, hopefully you got the point. Your 'understanding'
> of 'logic' is quite similar to that of the worst t
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 00:03:48 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 21:36:40 -
> > xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> >
> >> Rationality is, at its
> >> foundation, about AGREEING on some basic foundational ideas,
> >
> >
> >
> > "I could float off this floor like a soap bubble i
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 21:36:40 -
> xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
>
>> Rationality is, at its
>> foundation, about AGREEING on some basic foundational ideas,
>
>
>
> "I could float off this floor like a soap bubble if I wish to.
> I do not wish to, because the Party does not wish it."
>
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 21:36:40 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> Rationality is, at its
> foundation, about AGREEING on some basic foundational ideas,
"I could float off this floor like a soap bubble if I wish to.
I do not wish to, because the Party does not wish it."
>> I'm not anti-rationalist, any more than I am anti-wrench. It's a
>> tool. And when it is a useful too, I'm more than willing to use it.
>>
>> But not all problems are mere nuts and bolts.
>
>
> It's the only valid tool for rational discussions. But you
> want to be able to use ration
Yahoo secretly scanned customer emails for US intelligence-sources
http://dailym.ai/2dOI1gj via http://dailym.ai/android
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Spotted in Ars:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/report-fbi-andor-nsa-ordered-yahoo-to-build-secret-e-mail-search-tool/
Yahooâs CISO resigned in 2015 over secret e-mail search tool ordered by feds
Reuters: Yahoo "complied with a classified US government directive."
Cyrus Farivar - 10
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 17:42:24 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> > Besides since you are an anti-rationalist, why would you
> > care about any 'refutation'.
>
> I'm not anti-rationalist, any more than I am anti-wrench. It's a
> tool. And when it is a useful too, I'm more than willing to use it.
> Besides since you are an anti-rationalist, why would you care
> about any 'refutation'.
I'm not anti-rationalist, any more than I am anti-wrench. It's a tool. And
when it is a useful too, I'm more than willing to use it.
But not all problems are mere nuts and bolts.
>> lulz. You'r
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 05:11:49 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> >
> > It's quite clear that your idiotic ramblings are anything
> > but accurate. But of course, since your goal is propaganda,
> > accuracy is something you don't want at all.
>
> Thank you with going for the a-list troll mov
On 10/04/2016 09:39 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2016 09:59 PM, Razer wrote:
>> The poster of that tweet, @thegrugq, 'security researcher', also
>> said: "the government doesn’t use Tor."
>
>> https://twitter.com/attractr/status/783014723226861568
>
>> Comments?
>
> "I was familia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2016 09:59 PM, Razer wrote:
> The poster of that tweet, @thegrugq, 'security researcher', also
> said: "the government doesn’t use Tor."
>
> https://twitter.com/attractr/status/783014723226861568
>
> Comments?
"I was familiar with TOR an
"DetecTor is an open source project to implement client side SSL/TLS
MITM detection, compromised CA detection and server impersonation
detection, by making use of the Tor network."
http://detector.io/
> As X said, it DOES sort of tip the opponent off that you have something
> to hide, but whether they can identify 'you'... especially using
> something like Tails that spoofs your mac address and leaves no trace
> that you've ever done anything more than power up at a given time.
>
> So if you're
> It's worse than that :( In that I agree with much of what he says. Or at
> least, I get his perspective, as part of a working understanding. But
> he's clearly not interested in that :( So it goes.
Yeah. It's like I told a friend of mine once during a discussion.
"That is a lucid, cogent, well
On 10/04/2016 05:58 AM, John Newman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 06:59:57PM -0700, Razer wrote:
>> The poster of that tweet, @thegrugq, 'security researcher', also said:
>> "the government doesn???t use Tor."
>>
>> https://twitter.com/attractr/status/783014723226861568
>>
>> Comments?
>
> I
On Oct 3, 2016 9:16 PM, "John" wrote:
>
> Careful - Alex is gonna jump you guys shit for mocking his FSB butt
brother ;)
My dear John, being sincere, I was considering to move to Russia... ;)
http://listverse.com/2016/10/01/10-things-you-can-legally-do-if-you-go-to-the-right-country/
I would _
On 10/04/2016 07:19 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
>>
>> Ignoring what he writes, and declining to address whatever I notice,
>> works pretty well :)
>>
>
> Truth. I should learn to look at chatter like juan's as something akin to
> entropy.
It's worse than that :( In that I agree with much of wh
>
> Ignoring what he writes, and declining to address whatever I notice,
> works pretty well :)
>
Truth. I should learn to look at chatter like juan's as something akin to
entropy.
Alas, I have difficulty accepting the heat death of the universe as well;
I suppose that's 'on me' as they say.
>> Like I told ya. A dingy hotel bar napkin. I'd scan it and prove it to
>> ya,
>> since I know you like evidence and logic, but unfortunately I used it
>> for
>> cleanup and tossed it with the condom wrapper, and your mom's phone
>> number
>> already. True story.
>
> Mean :(
>
>
I know, I know.
On 10/03/2016 05:22 PM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
>> http://www.m.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/dissociative-identity-disorder-multiple-personality-disorder
>>
>> Were you abused as a child?
>>
>
> No, just having some 'fun' with Juan.
>
> Trying different strategies to see what will actually shut him
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 06:59:57PM -0700, Razer wrote:
> The poster of that tweet, @thegrugq, 'security researcher', also said:
> "the government doesn???t use Tor."
>
> https://twitter.com/attractr/status/783014723226861568
>
> Comments?
I would think US governemnt actors, using tor, would be
On 10/03/2016 02:00 PM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
>> Not 'we'. I'm commenting on the estalishment progaganda you
>> post.
>
> Yah.
>
>>
>> What? You can't come up with any decent answer, piece-of-shit
>> psychobabble scam artist?
>
> Actually, I found that answer quite enter
43 matches
Mail list logo
