> On Dec 23, 2016, at 4:17 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
>
> From: juan
>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:21:27 + (UTC)
> jim bell wrote:
>
> >> This essay by Christopher Cantwell pretty much destroys the
> >> "libertarians must be in favor of open borders" idea.
> >> https://christophercantwell.co
On 12/23/2016 05:27 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Rayzer
>
> On 12/23/2016 04:07 PM, jim bell opined:
>>
>> >>That outburst simply shows that you don't believe in the concept of
>> 'private property', which is often defined as 'the right to exclude
>> others'. Ironically, Communists (of whi
On December 22, 2016 9:21:51 PM EST, grarpamp wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:31 PM, John Newman wrote:
>> Too bad I spent the fuckers.
>
>Not really, spending legitimizes. Investing, even profit taking,
>is different. Either way, the long term performance and
True, and actually most times I
From: Rayzer
On 12/23/2016 04:07 PM, jim bell opined:
>>That outburst simply shows that you don't believe in the concept of
'private property', which is often defined as 'the right to exclude others'.
Ironically, Communists (of which you are obviously one) believe in the concept
On 12/23/2016 04:07 PM, jim bell opined:
>
> That outburst simply shows that you don't believe in the concept of
> 'private property', which is often defined as 'the right to exclude
> others'. Ironically, Communists (of which you are obviously one)
> believe in the concept of public, or collect
From: "Rayzer@Riseup"
On 12/23/2016 01:17 PM, jim bell wrote:
>>If 'public property' were eliminated, it would be possible to eliminate
>>"state's borders", converting them to private borders. What we now know as
>>"illegal aliens" could be excluded not by things called "governments", b
On 12/23/2016 01:17 PM, jim bell wrote:
If 'public property' were eliminated, it would be possible to
eliminate "state's borders", converting them to private borders. What
we now know as "illegal aliens" could be excluded not by things called
"governments", but instead by agreements among p
From: juan
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:21:27 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>> This essay by Christopher Cantwell pretty much destroys the
>> "libertarians must be in favor of open borders" idea.
>> https://christophercantwell.com/2015/09/28/open-borders-or-market-immigration/
> So, to wrap thi
https://torrentfreak.com/us-government-targets-pirate-bay-and-other-piracy-havens-161221/
https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2016/december/2016-notorious-markets-list
https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2016-Out-of-Cycle-Review-Notorious-Markets.pdf
https://ustr.g
All humans have basic human rights to privacy, freedom from
arbitrary search and seizure, due process, torture, murder, etc...
regardless of where they are, what citizenship they claim,
or who is interested in them. Any govt that adopts anything
less than the highest existing embodiment of such pri
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:21:27 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>
> This essay by Christopher Cantwell pretty much destroys the
> "libertarians must be in favor of open borders" idea.
> https://christophercantwell.com/2015/09/28/open-borders-or-market-immigration/
So, to wrap this 'issue' u
https://www.lawfareblog.com/surprisingly-weak-reasoning-mohamud
[Partial quote follows}By Orin Kerr Friday, December 23, 2016, 7:30 AMIn a
recent post here at Lawfare, April Doss argues that the Ninth Circuit’s
decision in United States v. Mohamud “got it right.” In her view, the critics
of the
>>http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Lua
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Canon_Basic
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Official_Canon_firmware_updates#Decrypters
https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=11229
https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=6119
http://magiclantern.wiki
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=186492&doclang=EN
The European Union’s top court has severely undermined the British
government’s mass surveillance powers in a new ruling that could rein
in police and spy agency investigations.
In a judgment handed down in Luxembourg on W
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Georgi Guninski
wrote:
> What is the importance of antimatter?
>
> As is known, I don't understand physics.
> The front page of wikipedia links to new results in antimatter
> related to antihydrogen.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antihydrogen
>
> What is the imp
From: Georgi Guninski
What is the importance of antimatter?
>As is known, I don't understand physics.
The front page of wikipedia links to new results in antimatter
related to antihydrogen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antihydrogen
>What is the importance of antimatter not counting nukes?
I
What is the importance of antimatter?
As is known, I don't understand physics.
The front page of wikipedia links to new results in antimatter
related to antihydrogen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antihydrogen
What is the importance of antimatter not counting nukes?
Why antimatter is accepted by
17 matches
Mail list logo
