On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Razer wrote:
>
> Fuck Graeber and everything he ever wrote. Even if he has any valid thesis
> it's not an original thought and I can find similar elsewhere. Hes a hack.
>
I neither know, nor very much care, about Graeber's personal & professional
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:44 AM, juan wrote:
> lolwut??
>
Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
On Aug 6, 2017 18:00, "Zenaan Harkness" wrote:
This might sound exceptionally unusual to those who have not
experienced this absud and strange type of human behaviour, but this
"ledger keeping" or "documentation of barter" simply does NOT happen
- not even in "modern 2017
On Aug 6, 2017 5:24 PM, "juan" wrote:
OK. Let me translate. People who know fuck about economics and
are brain-dead statists will enjoy their echo chamber in the
form of some shitty propaganda written by some
charlatan-apologist of the banking
On Aug 6, 2017 4:18 PM, "juan" wrote:
right wingers and
lefties are closely related fucktards.
Leftist = rightist = centrist = financialist.
Using these obsolete terms does nothing but stultify the conversation.
Let's try to find a more expressive and useful
People interested in economics may enjoy reading historian David Graeber's
excellent book, *Debt: The First 2000 Years*. (Available free at
https://archive.org/details/Debt-The_First_5000_Years)
Graeber argues that a) no actually-existing historical society used barter
as a primary component of
On Jul 14, 2017 11:53, "jim bell" wrote:
I've long believed that people should stop using the term "capitalism" when
they probably mean, "free market". "capitalism" might be the 1800
equivalent of "crowdfunding".
I agree people should use the word "capitalism" more
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Shawn K. Quinn
wrote:
> I am really lousy at memorizing gibberish.
>
If you do want gibberish, it's hard to beat pwgen:
$ pwgen -y -s -1 64
7(5Ip]cZZas745u5y;9zm/)^IG%j~1/DUd\d#k*T4tA3EI%C_AKZh#4^Et0h#/b+
$ pwgen -1 32
But, but, but... it's DUH LAW!
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> (Posted on behalf of an anonymous thoughtful person.)
>
>
> To paraphrase an associate from some years back:
>
> Many of today's "justice system" problems are the
>
Who cares?
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I'm shocked I tell you, truly shocked, that McDonalds has been
> serving Gay-unfriendly fries for so long, indeed 77 years no less!
>
> I'm surprised that McDs is so open about their White Supremacist past
>
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
>
> keep in mind, just how many computers run Intel. We don't backdoor
> encryption. We backdoor everything.
>
The back door is a *feature*, not a bug, right?
For instance, this company is quite proud of their back door
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Homogeneity of targets, makes for easier 0-day 0wnage of said
> targets, when one such target becomes of particular interest.
>
I, for one, run an OS that I wrote myself in TI-BASIC, on hardware salvaged
from the
Just because under tyranny good men fear to speak their minds in public,
does not mean there are no good men around.
On Mar 5, 2017 12:06, "\0xDynamite" wrote:
> Honestly, I'm back to this list shell-shocked. I left this
> civilization, thinking things were on track,
Leftist = Rightist = Centrist = totalitarian capitalist
C'mon folks, the tired left vs right narrative has almost zero power to
explain real politics. Everytime you play along and use those bogus terms,
you obscure your own position and make the public discourse stupider.
-- sent from my robot
Three cheers for censorship! Hup, hup, hurrah!
On Dec 26, 2016 03:57, "juan" wrote:
>
>
> Now pay-pal-ebay-greenewald's "The Intercept" features Censored
> Comments.
>
>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Georgi Guninski
wrote:
> I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it
> appears to support this.
>
Where did you hear said claim?
> I don't see enough "value" in the list for such attack,
Alternatively, one could
16 matches
Mail list logo