Bardi Harborow wrote:
> The lack of SPF, DKIM and DMARC records, as well as TLS, on the new
> list is still wreaking havoc with my spam filter. Any chance of a fix?
> I'd be happy to provide assistance.
I'm guessing the big change since we moved the list is TLS.
SPF is already in place.
There's
John wrote:
> The reason I asked: updating a few certs at office recently I nuked
> an older F5 LTM device by installing a 4096 bit key/cert pair - the
> load on the appliance (Linux based) shot up from less than 1 to about
> 30 and became so excruciatingly slow it was nearly impossible to back
>
Mirimir wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 12:21 AM, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
> > As an aside: note that the attack the Xiao paper describes only works
> > against Xen guests that *don't* use hardware-assisted page tables
> > (EPT for Intel, NPT for AMD). If you're using hardware-a
Georgi Guninski wrote:
> Does Rowhammer work in clouds? According to the popular story it
> affected only laptops.
The answer is "it depends."
Machines with ECC RAM make successful rowhammer attacks considerably
harder, and meanwhile most cloud providers use ECC (e.g., Amazon uses
ECC on all mac
"Riad S. Wahby" wrote:
> Also, as I promised grarpamp, I will soon publish and sign a copy
> of my local cypherpunks mbox going back to mid-2013. The previous
> archive, which contains every message to cypherpunks I've received
> since sometime in 1999, is now
"Stephen D. Williams" wrote:
> Cool. On the previous question of replicated email and mailman
> servers, I was recently looking into ways to do that. Since all
> email messages have unique IDs already, it isn't difficult to
> replicate messages at any point while avoiding duplicates and loops.
Greg Newby wrote:
> As I just wrote, this message should be going out via the
> *new* server and settings. It's addressed to cypherpunks at
> lists.cpunks.org, as opposed to the regular address, cypherpunks
> at cpunks.org
Folks,
If all has gone well, this message will reach you via the new lis
