Ted "Kadinsky"
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 2:50 AM professor rat wrote:
> The Unabomber's hate for the Left combined with two leading apostles of
> the Alt-right, Dark Enlightenment.
>
> Then attempted colonization of cypherpunk anarchist ideology.
>
> What could possibly go wrong?
>
>
> https://ww
from the NIST report on WTC7, downloaded directly from NIST's own website,
at https://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>
> Begins: "Never before or after 9/11 have steel framed buildings
> collapsed due to fire".
>
>
NI
for anyone interested, the page I pointed at previously contains links both
to the official explanations for the fall of WTC7, which include many
references to evidence, and public documents that clash with certain
aspects of that explanation:
http://www.consensus911.org/the-911-consensus-points/#W
I find the work by the 9/11 Consensus Panel to be the best-documented, most
detailed, and most sober set of questions about the event that I've read.
they have quite a bit of good evidence collected regarding WTC 7, both the
official and plausible stories about what brought it down, and the
questi
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Michael Nelson
wrote:
> The mapping between Bitcoin and energy is missing the point, from the
> point of view of understanding the system. The correct mapping is between
> Bitcoin and the *price* of energy.
>
> If electricity were 10 times as expensive, Bitcoin min
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Shawn K. Quinn
wrote:
>
> Maybe funded, as in past tense. The current Tor project is not dependent
> at all on US government funding that I can see. If you can prove
> otherwise, please post the proof.
>
proof is right there on Tor's own site. there is still subs
update: they appear to be back online at their usual address:
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/
- z
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Georgi Guninski
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 09:23:25AM -0800, Rayzer wrote:
> > The nsarchive.gwu.edu page now redirects to GWU's home page.
> >
> They are still arc
this is very concerning on its face, but one more data point in favor of
its being a temporary glitch is that I subscribe to their email list, and
got an email from them this morning around 9am about additions to their end
of the Soviet Union archive.although if one wanted to be paranoid, that is
a
ly through the US being attacked
directly.
but what did Mussolini know about fascism (despite being the leader of the
actual movement that gave us the word)?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:26 PM, z9wahqvh wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:37 PM, juan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>&g
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:37 PM, juan wrote:
>
>
> I wonder what an 'updated' new deal is considering that the
> Original New Deal was chemically pure fascism...
>
>
in which Juan-who-swears-he's-not-an-authoritarian-right-winger
demonstrates that he gets his analysis of fundament
a rare moment when Juan & the Washington Post agree
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/
11/11/if-you-voted-for-trump-because-hes-anti-establishment-guess-what-you-
got-conned/
-z
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:56 PM, juan wrote:
>
>
>
> So, how long before you admit that
11 matches
Mail list logo
