http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/technology/yahoo-email-tech-companies-government-investigations.html
]
Yahoo was ordered last year to search incoming emails for the digital
“signature” of a communications method used by a state-sponsored, foreign
terrorist organization, according to a
On 10/04/2016 08:49 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Shawn K. Quinn
>
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
>
>>> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
>>> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:07:52 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
> >> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
> >> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out
> >> >
From: Razer
On 10/04/2016 08:07 PM, juan wrote:
>> ...but I don't think the mafia known as 'american government'
>> would agree with that. Subjects, hostages or 'citizens' of the
>> american government are, well, subjected to that mafia. The
>> subjection has
From: Shawn K. Quinn
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
>> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
>> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly says
>> so. The term is called "extraterritorial
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>
> >
> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
> > and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
> >
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
"Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>
> I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
> and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
> un-American, if not flagrantly so.
Au contraire. It's 100%
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 20:07 -0700, Razer wrote:
> I was going to bring up the concept that corporate officers (at least)
> are really OWNED by the corporation that employs them and the US
> government probably considers them as 'being in the US' no matter
> where they go as long as they're in the
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly says
> so. The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
>
On 10/04/2016 08:07 PM, juan wrote:
>
> ...but I don't think the mafia known as 'american government'
> would agree with that. Subjects, hostages or 'citizens' of the
> american government are, well, subjected to that mafia. The
> subjection has little to do with which
On 10/04/2016 02:30 PM, jim bell wrote:
> Yahoo secretly scanned customer emails for US intelligence-sources
http://dailym.ai/2dOI1gj via http://dailym.ai/android
>
I wonder if the execs who approved this or someone on Y!'s legal team
who advised them to comply is secretly on Google's payroll
11 matches
Mail list logo