Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

So its not muslims that treat women like crap really so much its more everyone ... men women children ... infants ... thats the culture all around and this list isnt living in a bubble We have male and female aspects of our own selves and also in there in our psyche and spirit we treat the female

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Hi sea sea honey.- Muslim's are know to treat their women like shit - please run away to America the land of the free. Original Message On Oct 14, 2016, 9:40 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:46:51 -0400 John Newman wrote: > > > On Oct 14,

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 4:22 PM, "Razer" wrote: > > Someone sending me "I want to bury my face in your lap and smell your aroma or I'll commit suicide" Hahaha!!! Sorry, the idea is pretty fun. "Or you let me bury my face in your lap, or I'll commit suicide!" Hahaha!!! It's a

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 12:00 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 12:13 PM, Razer wrote: > > > >> I've violated NO ONE'S privacy. > > You've done what you've done. Others will act accordingly. > > > Stupidly ambivalent. Explain how posting an UNWANTED AND UNSOLICITED EMAIL violates the right to

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 12:13 PM, Razer wrote: > I've violated NO ONE'S privacy. You've done what you've done. Others will act accordingly.

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Razer wrote: > > > >> On 10/14/2016 10:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: >> Reposting email clearly intended to be private > > > Spam mail is intended to be private too. So I shouldn't pass that info > on to a sysadmin or other person who might

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:02:04 -0500 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 15:07 -0300, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:51:00 -0500 > > "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > > > > > > > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

hi hi jaun ;- Original Message On Oct 14, 2016, 10:59 AM, juan wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:51:00 -0500 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the > list to begin with, Like your constant calls

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:51:00 -0500 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the > list to begin with, Like your constant calls for censorship and your sick americunt propaganda, for instance. > such as

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:46 -0600, Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > No moderator worth his/her salt would ever have approved your posting. > > Something to think about. > > > > Reposting email clearly intended to be private is often in poor taste, > > even if

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 06:34 -0700, Razer wrote: >> Anyone wanna 'grab a digital

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 06:34 -0700, Razer wrote: > Anyone wanna 'grab a digital

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:34:59 -0400 John Newman wrote: > > An informal group dedicated to public education and dissemination of > encryption (also known as cryptography, the science and art of secret > writing). I originally hosted the mailing list (cypherpu...@toad.com) > and

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

> It's a waste of time and bandwidth responding to ... Lulz > Or the psychological stalking by Translation: When you call him on lies and bullshit, it's 'psychological stalking' ..thats so full of win, I'm going to start using that. Outright lie, and when called on it 'Hey, don't

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 10:22 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> >> Fishing for an age... Wrong. Don't bother trying again. >> > > Not two minutes before you sent the above quoted message, you posted a > message saying your reply would be the last in thread. Obviously not. > > But whatever. Uhm -- No, not

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 09:34 AM, John Newman responded to a troll responding to a troll: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0200, aestetix wrote: >> Make Cypherpunks Great Again. >> > > Lulz! I find it interesting that on John Gilmore's home page, under > accomplishments, he says the following about

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 09:22 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > Maybe you are a senile 1-yro after all? Because your memory is obviously > garbage But... umn, whatever you want to believe troll. Yeah, I said that was my last post in the thread. I misspoke. That's my last post addressing 'aff... CeCe'

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 1:08 PM, "Александр" wrote: > > 2016-10-14 18:52 GMT+03:00 Razer : >> >> Is there some part of "Fuck Off" you fail to comprehend troll? >> >> Or are you simply looking for codependent sympathy from your next >> stalking victims by posting

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

2016-10-14 18:52 GMT+03:00 Razer : > Is there some part of "Fuck Off" you fail to comprehend troll? > > Or are you simply looking for codependent sympathy from your next > stalking victims by posting that gibberish? > Razer, i'm sure it's the second option. Mirmir is already

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 08:29 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Oct 14, 2016 12:08 PM, "Razer" > wrote: >> >> I'm not some ... psychopath > > You are a hysterical, very noisy and dramatic psychopath, Razer. > > You are very sick. Please, as I said before,

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 12:08 PM, "Razer" wrote: > > I'm not some ... psychopath You are a hysterical, very noisy and dramatic psychopath, Razer. You are very sick. Please, as I said before, search for psychiatric treatment with urgence. We both are crazy, but I only hurt myself.

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Ok, I can't make anything if Razer prefers sex with little boys and to support Nambla. Sorry to everybody for this public soap opera. It's so bizarre that it becomes funny. I never will purr in laps of crazy hysterical guys like Razer again, I promise. So life goes on... :)

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Razer, you are strange. I am crazy, but you are crazier. And absolutely hysterical because don't like to lose a discussion, aff... On Oct 14, 2016 10:34 AM, "Razer" wrote: > > Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? > > Some people like 'em nuts. > > > I'm not interested. > >

Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? Some people like 'em nuts. I'm not interested. Rr Forwarded Message Subject:Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 02:09:30 -0300 From: Cecilia Tanaka I am really