I am mildly curious to look at a set of "false positive" pictures: The
pictures that his system reports are suspicious, but in fact are not. Why is
it wrong?Also: Is his system based on (simulated) neural networks, or some
other technology?
Jim Bell
On Tuesday, June 19, 201
I'm sure the tech he cobbled together has lots of other uses. For example,
astronomers might use it to search images for anomalies or interesting
objects.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018, 7:55 PM jim bell wrote:
> I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it:
>
> The $300 system in the fight against
I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it:
The $300 system in the fight against illegal images -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-44525358
* Disclaimer *
The BBC is not responsible for the content of this email, and anything written
in this email does not necessarily reflect the
