Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-06 Thread Mirimir
On 09/06/2017 12:20 AM, John Newman wrote: > > >> On Sep 5, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> >>> On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: >>> >>> On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: >> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> >> On 09/03/2017 12:05 P

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-06 Thread John Newman
> On Sep 5, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: >> >> >>> On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: >>> >>> > On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > > On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > >> On 09/02

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Marina Brown
On 09/06/2017 12:13 AM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/05/2017 04:50 PM, Marina Brown wrote: >> On 09/05/2017 10:39 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>> On 09/05/2017 02:56 PM, Marina Brown wrote: On 09/05/2017 09:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: >> >> >> On 09/05/

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Mirimir
On 09/05/2017 04:50 PM, Marina Brown wrote: > On 09/05/2017 10:39 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> On 09/05/2017 02:56 PM, Marina Brown wrote: >>> On 09/05/2017 09:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: >> >>

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Marina Brown
On 09/05/2017 10:39 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/05/2017 02:56 PM, Marina Brown wrote: >> On 09/05/2017 09:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>> On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: > > >> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>>

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Mirimir
On 09/05/2017 02:56 PM, Marina Brown wrote: > On 09/05/2017 09:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: > On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wr

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Razer
On 09/05/2017 06:56 PM, Marina Brown wrote: > On 09/05/2017 09:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: >>> >>> On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: > On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: >>

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Marina Brown
On 09/05/2017 09:14 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: >> >> >> On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > >> On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpam

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Mirimir
On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>> On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: > A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth t

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Steve Kinney
On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote: > > >> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> >>> On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: >>> >>> On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. Less time hobbled on "psyche

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread John Newman
> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: >> >> >>> On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>> A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. >>> Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". >>> More time on "revolutin". >>> Or at least

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-05 Thread Razer
On 09/04/2017 01:06 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > On 09/04/2017 11:00 AM, Razer wrote: >> >> On 09/03/2017 04:34 PM, jim bell wrote: >>> BZ (Quinuclidinyl Benzilate) is far easier to make than LSD, a dose >>> typically 2 milligram compared to LSD's 200 microgram. I've read >>> that the 'trip' las

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-04 Thread Steve Kinney
On 09/04/2017 11:00 AM, Razer wrote: > > > On 09/03/2017 04:34 PM, jim bell wrote: >> >> BZ (Quinuclidinyl Benzilate) is far easier to make than LSD, a dose >> typically 2 milligram compared to LSD's 200 microgram. I've read >> that the 'trip' lasts 3 days. > > > ... says someone who neve

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-04 Thread Razer
On 09/03/2017 04:34 PM, jim bell wrote: > > BZ (Quinuclidinyl Benzilate) is far easier to make than LSD, a dose > typically 2 milligram compared to LSD's 200 microgram. I've read > that the 'trip' lasts 3 days. ... says someone who never took STP. A 3 day peak and a total burn out. BZ was i

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread Steve Kinney
On 09/03/2017 09:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: >> >> >> On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>> A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. >>> Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". >>> More time on "revolutin". >>> Or at least gettin hippie

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 03:34:24PM -1100, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/03/2017 03:19 PM, grarpamp wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> Reportedly good blotter has been available on SR etc. > > > > Though not as popular a poison, there always seem to be > > a small number of we

Re: Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:34:01PM +, jim bell wrote: > On Sunday, September 3, 2017, 4:07:00 PM PDT, Steve Kinney > wrote: > > > On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: > > A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. > > Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". > > More time o

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread Mirimir
On 09/03/2017 03:19 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> Reportedly good blotter has been available on SR etc. > > Though not as popular a poison, there always seem to be > a small number of well regarded vendors in such markets. > A little disposable crypto cas

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread grarpamp
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Mirimir wrote: > Reportedly good blotter has been available on SR etc. Though not as popular a poison, there always seem to be a small number of well regarded vendors in such markets. A little disposable crypto cash and a maildrop is all it takes to run your own te

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread Mirimir
On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: >> A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. >> Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". >> More time on "revolutin". >> Or at least gettin hippie dirty, jiggystyle. >> Crypto rave, on. > > As

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread Steve Kinney
On 09/03/2017 07:34 PM, jim bell wrote: > On Sunday, September 3, 2017, 4:07:00 PM PDT, Steve Kinney > wrote: > > > On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: >> A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. >> Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". >> More time on "revolutin". >> Or a

Re: Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread jim bell
On Sunday, September 3, 2017, 4:07:00 PM PDT, Steve Kinney wrote: On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: > A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. > Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". > More time on "revolutin". > Or at least gettin hippie dirty, jiggystyle. > Crypto rav

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread Steve Kinney
On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote: > A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. > Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". > More time on "revolutin". > Or at least gettin hippie dirty, jiggystyle. > Crypto rave, on. As an unwitting participant in either one of the last MKULTRA

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-03 Thread No
https://libcom.org/library/poverty-hip-life A pro-situ critique of "hippie" life written by Contradiction in April 1972. Best critique I've read so far on the 60's hippie culture. On 09/03/2017 04:04 AM, grarpamp wrote: > Hobbled is distinctly descriptive. > If one gets up and acts, even if in

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-02 Thread grarpamp
Hobbled is distinctly descriptive. If one gets up and acts, even if in limited time luminary fashion, that's less than abjectly hobbled. Now, out... to ride me high horse in plainly hobbled fashion ;) Didn't Paul Revere ride horses... them effin rebels.

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-02 Thread Mirimir
On 09/02/2017 10:12 AM, Razer wrote: > > > On 09/02/2017 12:41 AM, grarpamp wrote (b/c the original poster is shitcanned > at > the server): >>> \0xd: >>> Yeah, humans are both the cause and the cure. The major source of >>> inadequacy in THIS population (crypto-anarchists) is the failure to >

Re: Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-02 Thread grarpamp
A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed. Less time hobbled on "psychedelics". More time on "revolutin". Or at least gettin hippie dirty, jiggystyle. Crypto rave, on.

Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

2017-09-02 Thread grarpamp
> \0xd: > Yeah, humans are both the cause and the cure. The major source of > inadequacy in THIS population (crypto-anarchists) is the failure to > examine why the 60's failed to produce the revolution it desired. It > had love, peace, and an awesome soundtrack -- yet it failed. 60s quite possib