Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-11 Thread Stefan Claas
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:23 AM Karl wrote: > > (honestly i am very confused by an assumption of discerning a private > key by hope for collision, as a normal thing without explanation or > reminder of some new change in technology or research making this > reasonable. i can't tell what is real

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Karl
(honestly i am very confused by an assumption of discerning a private key by hope for collision, as a normal thing without explanation or reminder of some new change in technology or research making this reasonable. i can't tell what is real here.) On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 7:17 PM Karl wrote: > >

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread grarpamp
On 11/9/20, Karl wrote: > https://www.lukbettale.ze.cx/alpath/ Quit fucking lazy top posting one fucking line while block quoting 700l and 21k back out. Learn some fucking email netiquette, including how to split threads off. Bunch of supposed cpunks can't even mail right, what a shame.

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Karl
i haven't been following closely, but it seems to me that spam.trap.mailing.lists made a not-presently-debunked comparison between the difficulty of finding a useful collision (goes down with time: more keys to collide with) and the difficulty of solving the proof of work (goes up with time). the

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread grarpamp
On 11/9/20, Stefan Claas wrote: > [Bitcoin...] not environment friendly due to high energy consumption? Your claim was already thoroughly and entirely debunked. Please stop trying.

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Stefan Claas
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 10:00 PM Karl wrote: > > > > > But in general you are right, people should do that and public places > > > > like > > > > Mailing Lists should also support injecting messages, via whitelisted > > > > anonymous Remailers. > > > > > > Is there a good place to go to find

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Karl
> > > But in general you are right, people should do that and public places like > > > Mailing Lists should also support injecting messages, via whitelisted > > > anonymous Remailers. > > > > Is there a good place to go to find quick introductions to such things? > > If you Google for Mixmaster

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Stefan Claas
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:21 PM Karl wrote: > > > I'm just an exotic troll, but I wanted to share with you that I > > > believe it is dangerous to reveal your legal name. I believe we need > snip > > > > > > What are your thoughts? > > > > Well, my thoughts are (I remember the old Usenet days

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Karl
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:08 PM Stefan Claas wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:54 PM Karl wrote: > > > > I made an ascii private key once and sent money to it. The money was > > withdrawn by someone else instantly. > > I also read recently that pretty high BTC funds 'changed' it's owner. Is

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Stefan Claas
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:54 PM Karl wrote: > > I made an ascii private key once and sent money to it. The money was > withdrawn by someone else instantly. I also read recently that pretty high BTC funds 'changed' it's owner. > Hi Stefan Class, > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:44 PM Stefan Claas

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Karl
I made an ascii private key once and sent money to it. The money was withdrawn by someone else instantly. Hi Stefan Class, On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:44 PM Stefan Claas wrote: > Regards > Stefan I'm just an exotic troll, but I wanted to share with you that I believe it is dangerous to reveal

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Stefan Claas
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM coderman wrote: > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Sunday, November 8, 2020 10:59 PM, Stefan Claas > wrote: > ... > > maybe interesting for some of you. > > > > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2020-November/064301.html > > > "Maybe someone

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Karl
https://www.lukbettale.ze.cx/alpath/ On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:12 PM coderman wrote: > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Monday, November 9, 2020 5:29 PM, Karl gmk...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > What's the best open source software near analytically reversing > cryptographic equations? > > > >

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread coderman
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, November 9, 2020 5:29 PM, Karl gmk...@gmail.com wrote: > What's the best open source software near analytically reversing > cryptographic equations? there are a number of different cryptanalytic attacks you can mount against a cryptosystem. so

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread Karl
What's the best open source software near analytically reversing cryptographic equations? On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:42 AM coderman wrote: > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Sunday, November 8, 2020 10:59 PM, Stefan Claas > wrote: > ... > > maybe interesting for some of you. > > > >

Re: GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-09 Thread coderman
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, November 8, 2020 10:59 PM, Stefan Claas wrote: ... > maybe interesting for some of you. > > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2020-November/064301.html "Maybe someone of you will have luck in the future to find a proper 256 bit

GnuPG 'Lottery' - 'fun' with 256 bit keys

2020-11-08 Thread Stefan Claas
Hi all, maybe interesting for some of you. https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2020-November/064301.html Regards Stefan