> xDynamite dreamingforward at gmail.com
> Tue Mar 21 00:35:43 PDT 2017
>
> Humans are not corrupt by nature.
The grarpamp is corrupt by nature.
Antonopoulos on...
Governance failures, trades, and markets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pJEEVEmEVw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtwaW79Fj7c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdknUUVOdHU
etc
Biggest threats and scare stories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhKIKB6cn6w
> There's certainly lots of real world governance models
> to try to draft and execute.
>
> Then there's another problem
> 1) Governance in the first place.
> and / or
> 2) That it's run by humans who are by nature corrupt.
Humans are not corrupt by nature. They have self-interest, that is
all.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:27:39 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> AI bots could execute within a novel network to
> - provide governance over humans,
Ah yes. You don't think human stupidity is enough, that's why
you want to 'enhance' it with Artificial Stupidity?
There's certainly lots of real world governance models
to try to draft and execute.
Then there's another problem
1) Governance in the first place.
and / or
2) That it's run by humans who are by nature corrupt.
There could simply be some type of free for all network,
new block refer to prior
l.ch), encrypted email based in
Switzerland.
Original Message
Subject: Governance vs Decentralised Systems, Gold, Cash, Bitcoin
Local Time: March 18, 2017 3:58 PM
UTC Time: March 18, 2017 7:58 PM
From: grarp...@gmail.com
To: cypherpu...@cpunks.org
https://www.youtube.com/wat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtwaW79Fj7c
Governance problems which have allowed skeptics in the media to
latch on to the failures of decentralised systems. Decentralisation
isn't a Boolean, it's a range. Is it much more decentralised than
anything we've built before, including its governance?