On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:57:20PM -0700, Razer wrote:
> Which is why I suggest attaching a password protected zip file of an
> already 2x encrypted pic of a lulzcat to every email.
>
> Feed the five-eyed beast garbage until it explodes.
>
Looong ago there was something similar: "Jam Echelon".
On 04/28/2017 09:59 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 09:39 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> It's prudent to assume that the NSA intercepts all Internet traffic. And
>> that it stores as much as it can, for as long as it can, focusing on
>> what seems most important. That everything is retained for
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 03:59:12 -0500
"Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 09:39 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> > It's prudent to assume that the NSA intercepts all Internet
> > traffic. And that it stores as much as it can, for as long as it
> > can, focusing on what seems most
On 04/28/2017 09:39 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> It's prudent to assume that the NSA intercepts all Internet traffic. And
> that it stores as much as it can, for as long as it can, focusing on
> what seems most important. That everything is retained for at least a
> few days. And then it gets triaged,
On 04/28/2017 07:39 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> But metadata and encrypted stuff, the NSA reportedly retains
> indefinitely.
Which is why I suggest attaching a password protected zip file of an
already 2x encrypted pic of a lulzcat to every email.
Feed the five-eyed beast garbage until it explodes.
On 04/28/2017 02:30 PM, Razer wrote:
> Author's "Wows" aside, there's no mention of the FBI's DIT unit's
> grabbing all US citizen's metadataz gleaned while rummaging for targeted
> 'suspects' and turning it over to the NSA, unless it's buried in the
> fine print somewhere (in a basement without