> I'm in total support of prosecuting whatever crimes
> have been revealed by Assange.
Did you spam all your employees and customers and their
employees to tell them that... and include a link to the
Collateral Murder video evidence of crime, and link them to
the other crimes revealed by the other
>
> You say you want to investigate all the criminal things: how is it
> "equality under the law" in the slightest to focus only on Assange and not
> all the things he revealed that could inform his proceedings?
I'm in total support of prosecuting whatever crimes have been revealed by
Assange. B
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 5:08 PM David Barrett wrote:
> Again, you have sent another email that avoids to state any kind of
> specific opinion. You are frustrated that I am putting words in your
> mouth, but it can't help but do so because you aren't saying anything.
>
> You haven't agreed that our
I'm sorry, I think I'm missing your key point. (You keep referencing back
to an email, which I think I've read, and I think I've responded to the
substance of, but if I haven't then please make your point.) The point I'm
trying to make, is:
1) The US/UK/etc justice system starts when you are tak
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, 7:27 PM David Barrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 2:50 PM Karl wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, I'm not intentionally ignoring it, I just don't know which you
>>> are referring to. Please repeat the point so I don't miss it. Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Did you get the email at this link c
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 2:50 PM Karl wrote:
> I'm sorry, I'm not intentionally ignoring it, I just don't know which you
>> are referring to. Please repeat the point so I don't miss it. Thanks!
>>
>
> Did you get the email at this link containing a reference to the bombing
> of MOVE?
> https://li
>
> Pollock. You should sell a NFT.
>
This mailing list should sell an NFT and we've gotta talk about that more
somehow huh.
Email for replying is previous one to this.
There is literally no semantic content in any of that. It's just vague
words where the reader is left to create meaning from your gibberish. It's
like a linguistic Jackson Pollock. You should sell a NFT.
-david
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:58 PM grarpamp wrote:
> Unjust is in action, by the unj
Unjust is in action, by the unjust, not on paper.
The "laws" they try to action and judge in "court"
should not be "laws" in the first place.
And Assange harmed no one.
In fact, they are harming Assange.
And no, Assange is not "free to leave".
#FreeAssange
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law
I'm checking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange to see what
others say is true.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 6:46 PM David Barrett wrote:
> Do we agree:
>
> 1. The US has requested that he be extradited
>
I'm assuming that is true.
2. The UK is currently holding him (and has been for 2 year
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 10:46 AM David Barrett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 2:09 AM Karl wrote:
>
>> One man cannot fight a multinational prosecution with the flick of his
>> finger. Hiding is the appropriate behavior here.
>>
>> What would you do if multiple governments -- especially the most
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 2:09 AM Karl wrote:
> One man cannot fight a multinational prosecution with the flick of his
> finger. Hiding is the appropriate behavior here.
>
> What would you do if multiple governments -- especially the most corrupt
> governments and the most corrupt parts of governmen
One man cannot fight a multinational prosecution with the flick of his
finger. Hiding is the appropriate behavior here.
What would you do if multiple governments -- especially the most corrupt
governments and the most corrupt parts of governments -- thought you were
their worst nightmare?
He isn't in prison is he? He is hiding in an embassy. He can leave at any
time. At that time he'll be given a chance to refute this witness, and if
it's as clear cut as you think. that'll be it. Then again... I think we
all agree that it's not nearly that clear cut, and that this one witness is
https://caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-weird-creepy-media-blackout-on
It's been more than three days since the stundin ​story broke, and yet
somehow not only is Assange still in prison, but the mass media are
completely ignoring the massive story about his case
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021, 2:45 AM
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021, 7:40 PM David Barrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:45 PM jim bell wrote:
>
>> https://stundin.is/grein/13627/
>>
>>
>> "Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to
>> fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks
>> founder.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:45 PM jim bell wrote:
> https://stundin.is/grein/13627/
>
>
> "Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to
> fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks
> founder. The witness, who has a documented history with sociopathy and
https://stundin.is/grein/13627/
"Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to fabricating
key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks founder. The witness,
who has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several
convictions for sexual abuse of minor
18 matches
Mail list logo
