Re: Snowden defends Comey

For Razer, with love! :D - [NSFW] Erotic Fruit-Fingering Bonus: http://stephaniesarley.com/videos (Some of them are very... hmm... suggestive! No, I never was veg(etari)an enough to love fruits so intensely, haha!!) == "The Zucchini Song" (SNL 1981) by Tim Curry

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Wed, 24 May 2017 02:46:29 -0400 grarpamp wrote: > > Euphemisms... > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuEQixrBKCc Carlin is so very good.

Re: Snowden defends Comey

> can’t tell if it is a high water mark, a low water mark, or just strange > will forever remember the day that i opened a cypherpunks email > and it started with these three words: > > “Snowden defends Comey” > and ended with these: > "better anal sensitivity :)&qu

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On May 23, 2017, at 8:36 AM, \0xDynamite wrote: OTOH, Chelsea Manning, >>> >>> You mean, Bradley Manning? >>> I suspect, due to her involvement >>> >>> HIS involvement. >> >> https://twitter.com/xychelsea/status/865250670831702016 >> >> Chelsea is a

Re: Snowden defends Comey

>> <mailto:catskillmar...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On 05/22/2017 08:23 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: >>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Dr. Carl W. Greer >>> <dr.gr...@protonmail.com <mailto:dr.gr...@protonmail.com>> wrote: >>>> Snowde

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 07:02:43PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 05/23/2017 10:14 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:36 AM, \0xDynamite > > wrote: > >> > >> Reasoning: You don't need to love Hitler either, but respect his > >> choices, HIS

Re: Snowden defends Comey

> My point is, I'm under no obligation to conform to > 'politically correct' totalitarian bullshit. Therefore I am not > going to pretend that people who are not women are women. Not > only this is an exercise of fucking free speech, it's also a > matter of sticking

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/23/2017 10:14 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:36 AM, \0xDynamite > wrote: >> >> Reasoning: You don't need to love Hitler either, but respect his >> choices, HIS freedom, his life. > > Godwin's Law, aff... Oh, God, this lack of arguments

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:41:57 -0400 Joshua Case wrote: > Some women have dicks. Nope, that's stupid nonsense. > Sorry. Not my fault. You saying nonsense is your fault. > It just happens to be the > case. No it doesn't happen to be case.

Re: Snowden defends Comey

Some women have dicks. Sorry. Not my fault. It just happens to be the case. > On May 23, 2017, at 5:26 PM, juan wrote: > > On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:04:05 -0400 > Joshua Case wrote: > >>> >>> >>> women don't have dicks - by defintion. >> >> >> Did

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:04:05 -0400 Joshua Case wrote: > > > > > > women don't have dicks - by defintion. > > > Did someone fall in love an get a surprise? Otherwise, why bother > yourself with someone else’s labels? Why bother with labels at all? Why care if

Re: Snowden defends Comey

> > > women don't have dicks - by defintion. Did someone fall in love an get a surprise? Otherwise, why bother yourself with someone else’s labels? I’m sorry you find it politically incorrect to use language that attaches dicks to women, but that is the world you live in. Description

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:46:20 -0400 Marina Brown wrote: > On 05/23/2017 04:38 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:30 PM, juan wrote: > >>> On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:13:57 -0300 > >>> Cecilia Tanaka wrote: >

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/23/2017 04:38 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:30 PM, juan wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:13:57 -0300 >>> Cecilia Tanaka wrote: >>> >>> It's hilarious, but completely nonsense. Her penis is _not_ an >>> important

Re: Snowden defends Comey

range sky. I know i screen capped and will > > forever remember the day that i opened a cypherpunks email and it > > started with these three words: > > > > “Snowden defends Comey” > > > > and ended with these: > > > > "better anal sensitivity :)

Re: Snowden defends Comey

ail and it started with these three > words: > > “Snowden defends Comey” > > and ended with these: > > "better anal sensitivity :)" Hahahaha!!! Loved it! ;D I was talking to a friend a few hours ago about this funny situation. We are using the CypherPunks list to discuss th

Re: Snowden defends Comey

I can’t tell if it is a high water mark, a low water mark, or just strange lights in a strange sky. I know i screen capped and will forever remember the day that i opened a cypherpunks email and it started with these three words: “Snowden defends Comey” and ended with these: "better

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/22/2017 08:23 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Dr. Carl W. Greer > <dr.gr...@protonmail.com> wrote: >> Snowden defends Comey >> >>> Cecilia Tanaka cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com >>> Fri May 19 05:48:35 PDT 2017 >>&g

Snowden defends Comey

> Mirimir mirimir at riseup.net > Mon May 22 23:05:41 PDT 2017 > > defending cutting dicks off > implying cut own dick off Confirmed /b/ user. Pics or GTFO.

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:43 AM, \0xDynamite wrote: > Correction. > > You know the REAL truth of Bradley/Chelsea Manning? S/He DOESN'T > exist. It's all a creation from the Matrix, the all-seeing-eye. She does exist. I know some persons who had direct contact with

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:36 AM, \0xDynamite wrote: > > Reasoning: You don't need to love Hitler either, but respect his > choices, HIS freedom, his life. Godwin's Law, aff... Oh, God, this lack of arguments is always pretty limited and fuck_ng boring. Hey, Mark, you

Re: Snowden defends Comey

Correction. You know the REAL truth of Bradley/Chelsea Manning? S/He DOESN'T exist. It's all a creation from the Matrix, the all-seeing-eye. I know this, because the story is ME. This is the fallout when I was holding the 2012 Mayan prophesy with the stength of the US military, but then

Re: Snowden defends Comey

>>> OTOH, Chelsea Manning, >> >> You mean, Bradley Manning? >> >>> I suspect, due to her involvement >> >> HIS involvement. > > https://twitter.com/xychelsea/status/865250670831702016 > > Chelsea is a very beautiful woman, my dear, and after years of prison > and deep and cruel psychological

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/22/2017 10:48 AM, Dr. Carl W. Greer wrote: > Snowden defends Comey > >> Cecilia Tanaka cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com >> Fri May 19 05:48:35 PDT 2017 >> >> please respect her choices, her freedom, her life. >> The same about all transgenders, please. >

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Dr. Carl W. Greer <dr.gr...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Snowden defends Comey > >> Cecilia Tanaka cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com >> Fri May 19 05:48:35 PDT 2017 >> >> please respect her choices, her freedom, her life. >&g

Snowden defends Comey

Snowden defends Comey > Cecilia Tanaka cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com > Fri May 19 05:48:35 PDT 2017 > > please respect her choices, her freedom, her life. > The same about all transgenders, please. If you cared at all about mannning's life, you would not defend the path that he ha

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/19/2017 08:48 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:34 PM, \0xDynamite > wrote: >> >>> OTOH, Chelsea Manning, >> >> You mean, Bradley Manning? >> >>> I suspect, due to her involvement >> >> HIS involvement. > >

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:34 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: > >> OTOH, Chelsea Manning, > > You mean, Bradley Manning? > >> I suspect, due to her involvement > > HIS involvement. https://twitter.com/xychelsea/status/865250670831702016 Chelsea is a very beautiful woman, my

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Razer wrote: >> > http://torrentking.eu/movie-1967/the-president-s-analyst-torrents/ >> I <3 The President's Analyst. Anybody here who ain't seen it, ought > Bureau didn't want the film made due to the unflattering portrayal of Fuck that shit,

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/14/2017 09:08 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 05/12/2017 11:26 AM, Razer wrote: > > > Sort of reminds me... > > http://torrentking.eu/movie-1967/the-president-s-analyst-torrents/ > > I <3 The President's Analyst. Anybody here who ain't seen it, ought > to see it. > > :o) > > Took a

Re: Snowden defends Comey

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/12/2017 11:26 AM, Razer wrote: > Sort of reminds me... > http://torrentking.eu/movie-1967/the-president-s-analyst-torrents/ I <3 The President's Analyst. Anybody here who ain't seen it, ought to see it. :o) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/11/2017 10:04 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 05/11/2017 07:42 PM, Razer wrote: > > > > On 05/11/2017 04:32 PM, juan wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 May 2017 13:27:44 -0400 Steve Kinney > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I think of Snowden as victim of circumstances controlled by >

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On May 11, 2017, at 7:34 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: >> OTOH, Chelsea Manning, > > You mean, Bradley Manning? > >> I suspect, due to her involvement > > HIS involvement. > What is a the point of these kind of content-free, hateful replies? What the fuck do you care

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Thu, 11 May 2017 19:29:15 -1100 Mirimir wrote: > And infiltration of dissident groups by Russian intelligence. that coming from the same guy who 'trusts' syverson and the rest of pentagon scumbags

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/11/2017 05:35 PM, Marina Brown wrote: > It's really sad that cypherpunks has become infested with alt-right > maggots. I came back after almost 15 years absence in the hope to hear > good cypherpunk stuff and talk of how to resist eavesdroppers and big > brother with cryptography. Yeah,

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:32 PM, juan wrote: >> Am I the only one >> who has noticed that every real-world consequence of The Snowden >> Affair has benefited his former employers? > > Well, I certainly noticed that after Snowden's 'disclosures' the > pentagon

Re: Snowden defends Comey

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/12/2017 12:35 AM, Marina Brown wrote: > On 05/11/2017 09:24 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> On 05/11/2017 12:34 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: OTOH, Chelsea Manning, >>> >>> You mean, Bradley Manning? [ ... ] > It's really sad that cypherpunks has

Re: Snowden defends Comey

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/11/2017 07:42 PM, Razer wrote: > > > On 05/11/2017 04:32 PM, juan wrote: >> On Thu, 11 May 2017 13:27:44 -0400 Steve Kinney >> wrote: >> >> >>> I think of Snowden as victim of circumstances controlled by >>> others,

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/11/2017 09:24 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 05/11/2017 12:34 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: >>> OTOH, Chelsea Manning, >> >> You mean, Bradley Manning? > > People can change their names, bro. > >>> I suspect, due to her involvement >> >> HIS involvement. > > Gender assignment represents the imposition

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/11/2017 12:34 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: >> OTOH, Chelsea Manning, > > You mean, Bradley Manning? People can change their names, bro. >> I suspect, due to her involvement > > HIS involvement. Gender assignment represents the imposition of a binary distinction on a complex multidimensional

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/11/2017 04:32 PM, juan wrote: > On Thu, 11 May 2017 13:27:44 -0400 > Steve Kinney wrote: > > >> I think of Snowden as victim of circumstances controlled by others, >> and very possibly an unwitting agent selected from a pool of >> candidates provided by the Insider

Re: Snowden defends Comey

> OTOH, Chelsea Manning, You mean, Bradley Manning? > I suspect, due to her involvement HIS involvement. > in the leaking > of the Crazy Horse 18 helicopter gunship assassination of a stringer for > Reuters, the wounding of another, and the better part of a civilian > family who came to assist

Re: Snowden defends Comey

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/05/no_author/blaming-russia-rather-saudi-arabia-israel/ Warrant Canary creator On May 11, 2017 6:40 AM, "John Newman" wrote: > https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/862069019301601281 > > "This FBI Director has sought for years to jail me on

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On Thu, 11 May 2017 09:39:54 -0400 John Newman wrote: > https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/862069019301601281 > > "This FBI Director has sought for years to jail me on account of > my political activities. If I can oppose his firing, so can you." snowden is losing it.

Re: Snowden defends Comey

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/11/2017 11:26 AM, Razer wrote: > > > On 05/11/2017 06:39 AM, John Newman wrote: >> https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/862069019301601281 >> >> "This FBI Director has sought for years to jail me on account of >> my political activities. If

Re: Snowden defends Comey

On 05/11/2017 06:39 AM, John Newman wrote: > https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/862069019301601281 > > "This FBI Director has sought for years to jail me on account of > my political activities. If I can oppose his firing, so can you." > > > > John Snowden is an "All-American Boy" who thinks

Snowden defends Comey

https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/862069019301601281 "This FBI Director has sought for years to jail me on account of my political activities. If I can oppose his firing, so can you." John signature.asc Description: PGP signature