On 02/01/2017 12:19 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 2/1/2017 5:03 AM, juan wrote:
>> So it clearly follows that the correct libertarian position on
>> travel is *open* *government* borders. And so any sort of
>> support for government restrictions on travel across government
>>
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:15:06 -0800
Razer wrote:
> The image illustrates collectivism. Not formal government.
so you are free to both think whatever mental vomits you want,
and also to promote them huh?
>
> The deer collectively agreed
Sure
The image illustrates collectivism. Not formal government.
The deer collectively agreed that route was the easiest path to water,
food, antler scratching trees, or whatever.
Ps. a town down the road initially put it's streets where the cows
walked because cows tend to walk on the most level
I'm reposting this quote, perhaps Jim B. has something to say
about it.
See also attached picture
"The question still remains, how comes such a thing as "a
nation" to exist? How do millions of men, scattered over an
extensive territory --- each
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:03:32 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>
> >> "the correct libertarian position is no GOVERNMENT borders."
>
> Since the presumption is that we will be getting rid of governments,
> things will have to change.
Looks like you changed the topic
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:16:11 -0500
John Newman wrote:
> I found the following gem on his blog, at which point I stopped
> reading, having reached my revulsion limit:
I find it somewhat entertaining in a sick kind of way.
Here's another nugget
"If we
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 07:03:32PM +, jim bell wrote:
> >> (Corporations own property, today.)
>
> > So? Mafias chartered by the state 'own' 'property'. The state
> > creates more than a few legal devices to favor
> > businesses. Big businesses today are the poster child for
> >
From: juan
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:07:07 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
> > I believe the correct libertarian position is no
> > GOVERNMENT borders. Not no borders at all.
>
> > Borders are by defintion a creation of the state. And
> >
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 08:11:02 -0500
John Newman wrote:
> https://blog.jim.com/
>
> much more reflective of the garbage he's posted here.
>
Oh, I see. Thanks. So he's a full time conservative troll
posing as 'libertarian'.
> --
> John
>
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:19:53 +1000
"James A. Donald" wrote:
> On 2/1/2017 5:03 AM, juan wrote:
> > So it clearly follows that the correct libertarian position
> > on travel is *open* *government* borders. And so any sort of
> > support for government restrictions on
On 2/1/2017 5:03 AM, juan wrote:
So it clearly follows that the correct libertarian position on
travel is *open* *government* borders. And so any sort of
support for government restrictions on travel across government
borders is not libertarian.
And if Islamic
John Newman:
>
>
>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 5:31 PM, John Newman wrote:
>> I'm totally on board with your analysis of American politics. I think Trump
>> is a slight outlier, not really possessed of any ideology but his own ego,
>> and almost honest about it with his visceral
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 5:31 PM, John Newman wrote:
> I'm totally on board with your analysis of American politics. I think Trump
> is a slight outlier, not really possessed of any ideology but his own ego,
> and almost honest about it with his visceral moronic outbursts.
>
>
On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Ray Cis wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31 2017 07:59:35 -0700
>> "Razer" wrote:
>> I'm quite serious. The democrats and republicans do not exist as separate
>> ideological entities. They are in collusion with each other.
>
> Republicrat, Democran,
No man, I was talking about Zen. Shitbag that started this thread.
I'm totally on board with your analysis of American politics. I think Trump is
a slight outlier, not really possessed of any ideology but his own ego, and
almost honest about it with his visceral moronic outbursts.
John
> On
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:56:49 -
"Ray Cis" wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30 2017 21:41:24 -2100
> > "juan" wrote:
> >
> > well, that's the sort of question *you* should be asking
> > yourself. As in. you should be heading back to england.
>
> And you to Spain, or Portugal.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:07:07 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
> > I believe the correct libertarian position is no
> > GOVERNMENT borders. Not no borders at all.
>
> > Borders are by defintion a creation of the state. And
> > vice-versa. A state is defined by its
> On Mon, Jan 30 2017 21:41:24 -2100
> "juan" wrote:
>
> well, that's the sort of question *you* should be asking
> yourself. As in. you should be heading back to england.
And you to Spain, or Portugal.
You white motherfucker.
Check your privilege !
> On Tue, Jan 31 2017 07:59:35 -0700
> "Razer" wrote:
> I'm quite serious. The democrats and republicans do not exist as separate
> ideological entities. They are in collusion with each other.
Republicrat, Democran, one-party system.
But John knows that, hee works for the DNC.
> "Give me your
I hope you don't consider my comment trolling John. I'm quite serious.
The democrats and republicans do not exist as separate ideological
entities. They are in collusion with each other. Because 'Merican
Exceptionaism uber alles'. US Libertarians have that social disease too,
and are no different
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
>> On 01/29/2017 06:08 PM, #$%
Some serious entertainment at the moment:
16 Muslim nations ban Israeli passport holders from entering,
so where's the "outrage" over this?:
http://theduran.com/here-are-is-a-list-of-the-16-countries-that-ban-israelis-from-entering-their-country-where-is-the-liberal-left-outrage/
Islamic
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:08:15AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> This is getting ridiculous, Trump must be stopped before he turns
> America into a White nation - he is shockingly close now to being
> Literally Hitler!!!
>
> What can we do?
For anyone who missed the memo amongst all the
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:45:55PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 1/31/2017 12:29 PM, Razer wrote:
> >The reason
> >Trump is even ABLE to purport a rationale for the immigrant ban is
> >because HILLARY CLINTON facilitated the destruction of Libya, and
> >attempted to do the same to Syria.
> >
On 1/31/2017 12:29 PM, Razer wrote:
The reason
Trump is even ABLE to purport a rationale for the immigrant ban is
because HILLARY CLINTON facilitated the destruction of Libya, and
attempted to do the same to Syria.
Trump's Executive Order rests on laws and codes that Obama put in place.
From: juan <juan@gmail.com>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 05:45:21 + (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: juan <juan@gmail.com>
> To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 9:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Trump
Borders often define the boundaries of failing and failed states,
to prevent exit and continue enslavement of its people, and as often
are arbitratily drawn and enforced upon the earth by such states
themselves without permission and to detriment of others.
Some history on related Abrahamic,
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:13:02 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> - the libertarian position is no borders, no citizens, no
> government.
well at least you got that one right.
Or almost right. "citizens" is not the right word. The
right word is SUBJECTS.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:13:02 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> - the libertarian position is no borders, no citizens, no
> government.
well at least you got that one right.
>
> - should the "White invaders" into USA be deported back to Europe?
well, that's
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:13:02PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> - what ration of "whites" / other races is "acceptable"?
s/ration/ratio/
> governments and therefore ought suffer the tyranny of having to copy
s/copy/cope/
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:13:47PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 06:08 PM,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Shawn K. Quinn
wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 06:08 PM, #$%
This is getting ridiculous, Trump must be stopped before he turns
America into a White nation - he is shockingly close now to being
Literally Hitler!!!
What can we do?
33 matches
Mail list logo